Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    55,149

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. Bellhorn04
    .670 OPS and 21 Ks in 13 games.
  2. Bellhorn04
    Cheap!!!
  3. Bellhorn04
    Well, if they let Bregman go they just get worse. Plus a lot can change in a year in this game. Anyway, my call is they don't trade Bregman even if they're selling. We'll see what happens.
  4. Bellhorn04
    Sorry, you're not going to convince me they didn't go cheap in 2024, especially after the 'full throttle' pronouncement. Why do you think 'full throttle' came to piss so many people off?
  5. Bellhorn04
    Deja vu all over again. It's depressing if you dwell on it too much. Especially with a month to go before the deadline.
  6. Bellhorn04
    With Bregman it's more about if the team wants to compete next year or not. If the Sox keep playing like crap the next few weeks it's pretty clear they should trade Chapman and the other expiring contracts.
  7. Bellhorn04
    I'm starving for really good players, I know that much. With Devers gone, Bregman is the only real proven position player on the team.
  8. Bellhorn04
    But even if they do it's only for one year, like Wacha, then it's bye-bye. That's all part of the cheap philosophy they were following. Hopefully they stay open to spending as the Crochet/Bregman/Buehler investments indicated they were this year.
  9. Bellhorn04
    Depends if he comes back strong or not. If he does, opting out is a possibility, especially if he thinks the Sox are a trainwreck of a franchise. It's $40 mill but it's only 2 years, and he's an elite player. Hard to predict, really.
  10. Bellhorn04
    It's a little early to say that.
  11. Bellhorn04
    Right, going cheap again had a lot to do with trading Sale. I've been saying that all along.
  12. Bellhorn04
    No. I've never said anything like that. We needed an upgrade.
  13. Bellhorn04
    Giolito was a risky guy too. In his case it was performance risk after a horrific stretch of pitching. I was not upset when I first heard about trading Sale. But when the offseason was over and I realized all we had done was swap Sale for Giolito, I was disgusted.
  14. Bellhorn04
    You're right, but look at what it's done to the Sox the last 3 years. They've been very indecisive, knowing the team probably wasn't good enough but not wanting to chuck it all in. This is one of the results of the ever-expanding playoff system. Manfred and the owners like it because it means more money.
  15. Bellhorn04
    There's still a month left to the deadline, of course. A lot could happen. Or not. Sox fandom is generally feeling gloomy these days, needless to say. Some of our resident armchair team builders have been talking about selling for quite a while now.
  16. Bellhorn04
    The extension was before 2019.
  17. Bellhorn04
    They paid Giolito 19.25 (AAV) and Sale 17 for a total of 36.25. Some savings.
  18. Bellhorn04
    That question is only pertinent if we're working from a premise that all Breslow needed to do was replace Sale. Objectively speaking, what Breslow did was swap Sale for Giolito and Grissom, and that cost us $36.25 million in AAV. And before Giolito's injury the projected 2024 WAR's for Giolito and Sale were about equal. So even ignoring what actually happened, Breslow did absolute zero to upgrade the rotation.
  19. Bellhorn04
    There was deferred money in Sale's extension. Guess they thought of it just a tiny bit late...
  20. Bellhorn04
    I'm not sure this ever happened with Mookie. There is however a contingent of Sox fans who think Mookie was the one who wanted out.
  21. Bellhorn04
    They would at least retain the ability to rework the deal between now and November if Bregman is interested.
  22. Bellhorn04
    We don't really know what kind of return he would bring. He's on the IL right now, he's guaranteed a lot of money over the next 2 years and he has opt outs at the end of this year and next. It'd be a PR debacle because it'd be one more sign to the fans that this team still isn't really serious about competing.
  23. Bellhorn04
    Someone else mentioned this idea. It's one of those ideas that seems to make some sense until you really think about it. The problem is that it could only be a verbal agreement, and as such it would be worth less than zero. Let's not forget that one possible scenario is that Bregman's quad injury turns out to be a big deal. You think the Sox would honor their verbal agreement if it is? Once you trade him you're in the same position as the other 28 teams who don't have any control over him.
  24. Bellhorn04
    It's not so much the signing as that it was the only signing.
  25. Bellhorn04
    I don't think they trade Bregman. That would be one more PR debacle.
×
×
  • Create New...