Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,040
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. If the goal is to reduce payroll, he's well on his way to pulling it off.
  2. P for Punt.
  3. Let's face it, if they sign Paxton he might pull an Aaron Rodgers and not even make it through his first inning.
  4. Because Henry wants to spend even less. He's doubling down!
  5. I think it's time for LeBron to speak up. He owns 1% of FSG, so his stake in the Red Sox is about $50 mill. You care about winning, don't you, LeBron? A few choice words about the Sox dubious direction might get someone's attention...
  6. "Stroman might still be a slight hope" kind of says it all, moon.
  7. Burnes is a no-go. He's already said he's not signing an extension unless he's blown away. Teams like the Red Sox need not apply.
  8. Sure, but they're probably too cheap to sign Hader either.
  9. More likely Paxton and Giolito. Imanaga will be too expensive for this penny-pinching outfit. He'll probably get more than ERod or Gray.
  10. If we're giving up on 2024, sure. If we're not giving up on 2024, I fail to see how having Jansen on the team is a waste. It's all about how this ******** front office has us thinking these days.
  11. Right now per Cot's: Mets 297 Dodgers 288 Yankees 287
  12. It might not be punting, but the return would have to be good for anyone to like it. And which teams would be interested in Jansen or Martin for one season only? Probably only teams that are all in on 2024 and have a need in the bullpen. Phillies maybe. But who would they be interested in trading that would be helpful to the 2024 Red Sox?
  13. Not in AAV, that is.
  14. The price is a tad lower, hopefully. I'll take anyone who has ever tasted success in the big leagues, however briefly, at this stage. (Excluding those who are dead, retired etc.)
  15. Yes, they really need to trade for some overhyped pitchers and overpay them instead. Burnes is all set to sign an extension with any team that blows him away.
  16. Maybe Lowe's will have a Boxing Week sale on pitchforks and torches. We need one piece of good news at least.
  17. I'm not really buying the stuff about Cora's future being in the Sox front office, either. He's getting hung out to dry here too. I don't see how he can possibly be happy with what's going on.
  18. They might even be thinking Stroman is too expensive.
  19. https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2023/12/some-things-i-think-i-think-on-facing-facts-about-the-red-sox-and-more.html
  20. For those who didn't read it, McAdam basically confirms the Sox are NOT in on Montgomery.
  21. To me it's plausible and helps explain why they didn't get around to trading him until February. Mookie also said there was no 300 mill offer, and that claim hasn't been refuted either. It's all in the land of rumors, innuendo and speculation and forever will be, I guess.
  22. Crag and his brother Clff.
  23. Maybe Breslow told the owners he was 100% sure he could put together a good rotation on the same shoestring budget that Bloom had. "You're hired!"
  24. Our fantasy that the Red Sox have a competent front office is just that.
  25. Career fWAR and projections both say they're very close.
×
×
  • Create New...