Bellhorn04
-
Posts
54,669 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
75
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Bellhorn04
-
And the Yanks have Ellsbury on the books for 2 more years at 22 mill AAV.
-
True enough. Though I think he sort of went into hiding during that period.
-
He's waiting a long time then. When the 2019 season is over it will have been 4 years + since he was our GM.
-
I'm guessing he's had opportunities and that he doesn't want that position again.
-
Unless maybe they go the bells and whistles route and give him a heavily front-loaded deal with an attractive opt out...
-
There's another reason it's tough to judge Ben. He's never been a GM before or after his 3.5 year stint with us.
-
In 2018 the Cubs had 5 relievers with an AAV of $3.5 million or more-Morrow, Cishek, Strop, J Wilson and Duensing. Their total AAV was about $32 million. If Theo is the man, doesn't this suggest it's a sound strategy to spend a bit on the pen?
-
Sure, take a risk, Dave. Just make f'ing sure it works.
-
What's funny about this particular discussion is that Dombrowski was so heavily criticized by many for not devoting enough attention to the pen in Detroit's years of contention.
-
Ben devoted huge resources to acquiring an established closer. Theo has also invested huge resources in his pen starting in 2016 with the trade for Chapman.
-
Unfair. Theo would do the same.
-
I kind of like moon's idea of signing Cody Allen. Assuming our scouts and analytics guys have figured out what went wrong with him last year and how to fix it.
-
As I said in the other thread, this is not just DD's MO. It's no different from what Theo or Ben would do in this position, if you look at their histories.
-
It's not something Theo or Ben would do, either. If you look at their histories, most years Theo and Ben went into the season having invested pretty heavily in the bullpen through signings or trades.
-
Kind of a false equivalency, I think. Bogaerts is going to be looking for $200 million or so. Signing Kimbrel wouldn't be the difference-maker in keeping Bogey or not. It's not like if we sign Kimbrel we'll have an expensive bullpen compared to other teams. Right now we have a very inexpensive bullpen.
-
The Machado decision is going to be huge for the Yankees, one way or the other.
-
That's a plausible scenario, except I don't think the Phillis would have gone as high as 350 million. I think the numbers will come in lower than that. How about 8 years, 280 million, opt out after 3. That would be the best contract offer in history based on the AAV and the opt out.
-
I agree that Theo was excellent at that. But it must also be noted that the rules in this area have changed substantially, and the 'reward' for letting a free agent walk is pretty small now.
-
I really don't know what the answer is. I think any rules we could come up with are going to be arbitrary to some degree. You're always going to get different opinions from different people. We've already heard that one of the voters isn't going to vote for Rivera. Should David Ortiz be in? Schilling? I think they should be, but I realize they are not clear-cut choices.
-
I think Kimbrel is in for a big letdown. His numbers were just not very good last year, especially when you include his postseason numbers, which were downright horrible of course. I can definitely see him having to settle for $60 million.
-
If CWS and PHI are willing to go 10 years, don't you think they'd also be willing to give him an opt out?
-
You are a fearless prognosticator!
-
Devers has a better K/BB ratio though. His is about 3/1, whereas WMB's was about 5/1.
-
I don't need a twitch test. I already know I'm very twitchy.
-
That's for sure.
