Agreed. The facts totally contradict Larry's statement. Which is nothing new, of course. There are reasons he does his posting in late night drive-by fashion, and rarely responds when anyone calls him on his nonsense.
Looks like this is about to become a major story. Former player Mike Fiers has blown the whistle* on the technology-aided sign stealing system the Astros used in 2017 en route to winning the title. MLB is launching an investigation.
*The Astros having the 'whistle blown' on them is a little ironic, as we will see.
The reprisal was butchered by the Sox (thanks, Farrell). They didn't take care of it right away (E-Rod threw some pitches half-assedly toward Machado but missed) and they did it the wrong way by throwing at the head.
Come on man.
Who did the 'It's not me, it's them' thing hurt? It hurt Pedroia, and that's it.
Did it hurt Matt Barnes or John Farrell? No, of course it didn't.
It was a victimless crime, other than Pedroia himself.
A relatively encouraging report on Sale's health from his agent:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/redsox/2019/11/11/chris-sale-has-something-prove/pml8qIJiBxqxFV3a7GprZN/story.html
No specific date for when he is seeing Dr. A again.
When it comes to defense, arguing that the eye test is as good as metrics is equivalent to arguing that real umps can do as good a job as robot umps.
In fact, I think they're working toward the defensive stats being compiled virtually automatically with video and measurement technology.
Defensive metrics actually played a big role in one of the most important trades in Red Sox history.
In 2004, after Nomar Garciaparra returned from his injury, the Red Sox were troubled by his apparent loss of range. They hired a firm to chart his defensive range compared to average shortstops. The results confirmed that he was a seriously diminished defender. (Per Shaughnessy's book Reversing the C****)
This factored into Theo's decision to trade him and to get back a good defensive shortstop in Cabrera.