Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Bellhorn04

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    55,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Bellhorn04

  1. A fluke is a fluke - I like Bloom but not even I will be crediting him for foreseeing a pandemic.
  2. Now this is some sweet hyperbole right here.
  3. Now I think you're getting carried away a bit. How are the owners 'demonizing' the players? Looks to me like they're just playing a little hardball on the salaries.
  4. You can be wacky sometimes.
  5. True enough. My position here is just that Cora's punishment was sufficient for what he did.
  6. I'm going with that too.
  7. I wouldn't call what happened to Cora a slap on the wrist. He was banned for a year, fired and humiliated. The washout of the season is just a fluke that has affected a lot of things.
  8. Good stuff. I'm a big fan of HV III, love to see him win one, or make some serious money at least.
  9. Which is so different from the other major sports, right? More evidence that baseball is a tough and tricky game, I guess.
  10. I think Drew's signing was fine too.
  11. If it was me doing the list I'd probably add back 25 million if the guy was instrumental in getting a ring - that applies to Price, Lackey & Drew. But not Lugo or Dice-K. Well, maybe 10 million for Dice-K.
  12. If your list is meant to be restricted to free agent signings, AGon shouldn't be there anyway.
  13. The list is too long, I think. For me the amount of wasted money is a big factor. Snow's 2 million dollars was a very insignificant amount.
  14. J. T. Snow at #14? His contract was 2 million dollars.
  15. A day late and a dollar short!
  16. Kimmi already posted the story on the previous page?
  17. And I agree with a lot of this. If I'm being devil's advocate for the owners I would argue what is being called sharing of losses is pay cutting, which is commonplace when businesses are losing money. I could also argue that players do share profits, indirectly, because when business is booming players are getting monster contracts - guaranteed contracts that will be paid even if the player tanks.
  18. Interesting statement that deserves some analysis. My first question would be how and when have the owners actually socialized losses.
  19. I think just when we've all given up, they'll pull something together.
  20. To try to get you to stop expressing your opinion was not my goal, I promise. Just trying to point out the political aspects.
  21. I know, but the entertainment factor is why the thing exists in the first place. It's our need for entertainment that underlies all the billions.
  22. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Republicans and Democrats using Covid-19 for other purposes.
  23. I don't see a big difference between this and some of the battles between management and labor in other businesses.
  24. Minimal? You need to refresh yourself on the meaning of 'stakeholder'. Our stake is huge. We're the customers, who collectively fund the whole damn thing...
  25. I don't think that should be the case. But the situation with MLB players and owners rises to the level of a political issue, because it's a conflict of power and money that a lot of people have a stake in.
×
×
  • Create New...