Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

User Name

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by User Name

  1. User Name
    So what happens when Garin Cecchini inevitably explodes as well? Both of 'em to shag balls in the OF?
  2. User Name
    Thanks a lot. This is probably the year i don't make the finals then haha.
  3. User Name
    The mere thought of what the Red Sox are going to start doing to the rest of MLB once their numbers with runners on normalize has me fully erect right now. Fully.
  4. User Name
    Not all of us can have a sense of humor, my friend
  5. User Name
    Don't forget about Lackey's horse face. It's distracting our hitters at the plate.
  6. User Name
    Let's move the goalposts, why don't we
  7. User Name
    The bar for reliever's replacement level has been set pretty low with the league-wide struggles for closers from last season and the start of this one.
  8. User Name
    Not only that, but it uses a benchmark based on league-wide production to define what a "win" is. Replacement-level play varies on a season-to-season basis, so you can't just look at it and interpret it on a sum-total level on such a small sample IMO.
  9. User Name
    I disagree on the basis of what the actual UZR formula measures overall. Remember that there's and adjustment/normalization component to a "win" that's not simply a calculation of runs saved/created.
  10. User Name
    Not three more runs, but rather a third of a win.
  11. User Name
    But playing 81 games in LF at Fenway greatly diminishes defensive impact, which is what i think MVP was trying to get at.
  12. User Name
    No, this is false, and silly. It has been stated and proven over and over and over that the problem is the lack of hitting with RISP. The team, as a whole, is doing a fine job of getting on base, especially from the #1 hole since Pedroia took over. The problem is the inability to get people who get on base in. The "we're struggling because Ellsbury is not here" narrative is ridiculous.
  13. User Name
    .308 with men on, .357 w/RISP.
  14. User Name
    Yeah but it's not just them. They are hitting .222 as a team with RISP, and .239 with runners on. That is pathetic.
  15. User Name
    No one needs to "get hot", they just need to stop failing so miserably with RISP as a team. They are getting on base as a unit, but can't get anyone home in the most elemental of situations.
  16. User Name
    All's well that ends well.
  17. User Name
    Well that sucked
  18. User Name
    Too tentative. Needs to swing the bat.
  19. User Name
    Bradley is most certainly not the problem with this team's offense.
  20. User Name
    Anyways, he started flaming people left and right even before the reference. Good riddance.
  21. User Name
    Isn't it a 4chan thing?
  22. User Name
    Soooo....you want Salty back? 'Cause i know i don't.
  23. User Name
    I think Bradley's going to make a lot of people look silly by the end of the year. The OB skills are there, but he needs to adjust to the advanced stuff (pitching backwards, MLB-level breaking balls). He's not the first player to struggle coming out of the gate, and he won't be the last.
  24. User Name
    How does this make sense? You don't know what you're talking about. STFU and go away.
  25. User Name
    For someone who likes to call others "f***ing idiot", you're not very good at making sense. The fact that he hasn't hit #1 in a lineup since 2007 means jack s***. Look at his production from the #1 spot, "you f***ing idiot".
×
×
  • Create New...