Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

iortiz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    17,903
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by iortiz

  1. At MLB.tv, they haven't announced that it will be postponed, and we are just 20 min away to sart the game.
  2. Thank you cp, you have earned a bottle of tequila my friend LOL! Back to topic, I really like how the team looks like after a month. It actually has overpassed my expectations.
  3. Tough guy? Naaahhh quoting Lionel Richie "I'm easy like a Sunday morning"
  4. As I said, I haven't talked about him for a while. Also if I find an interesting debate regarding Cherington and I'm pleased to participate, I will. The problem is that some of you take so serious the jokes about Cherington and other players for some reason. Furthermore, those jokes are not even close to what you do with Papelbon, and no one is suggesting you to stop, so again... please be consistent. both are irrelevant to me.
  5. Well, I haven't for a while. As I said, IMO he was only a puppet, so he doesn't require my attention anymore LOL! On the other hand if a debate takes place regarding Cherington and I'm pleased to debetae it, I will, whether you or U? or whoever like it or not.
  6. So you can beat a dead horse-like Papelbon, Panda, etc.- and other people can't talk about Cherington or other topics you consider dead horses? Follow your own advise, be consistent.
  7. I have no problem if you talk about Papelbon, Panda, Cherington, etc. I called you out because you don't let people debate on things you don't like. For instance, the Cherington thing-- topic that I didn't even bring to the table.
  8. Actually I didn't start this, pal. Go figure.
  9. ... But again, other than u, no one complains when the Cherington thing comes up.
  10. At this point, and the more I think about the subject, I don't care about Cherington since I think he was nothing but a puppet. On the other hand if the topic come up, I have no problem reading other people debating it as u do. The same goes for Papelbon, Porcello, Panda, Farrell, etc. - I have no problem reading people debating about those issues.
  11. how is that? What do U think regarding Porcello, Then?
  12. It isn't done, unfortunately for u, LOL! Time to time people will talk about him, just like other players who are not here anymore or some situations that happened in the past. Again, you are the only one here who always point out when the topic comes up... For so,e reason you don't want that the topic isn't touched anymore... And it won't happen... Time to time it will come up for different circumstances... Like the recent discussion begun by sk.
  13. It isn't done, unfortunately for u, LOL! Time to time people will talk about him, just like other players who are not here anymore or some situations that happened in the past. Again, you are the only one here who always point out when the topic comes up... For some reason you don't want that the topic isn't touched anymore... And it won't happen... Time to time it will come up for different circumstances... Like the recent discussion began by sk.
  14. What would be the over/under? Based on the projections you made a year ago regarding him? The other stat could be HR/FB%.
  15. No I'm not trying to start anything but the opposite... you are the only one here who is irritating about this. You seem like Cherington defender patrol. As I said, live with it or ignore it, no big deal.
  16. Yeah but the topic will come up time to time. Like panda. Like Porcello. Like Papelbon. Etc. those are baseball related topics, and the debate will come over and over agian. Let them debate, no big deal.
  17. LOL! I think I'm going to be in August in NY and Boston again. I tell what, I will buy a couple of bottles of great tequila and you put the beers --I like beer as chaser with tequila- and make a bbq or something while watching a Red Sox game. Porcello is 2.7 ERA right now. I think I offered a sign bet to U? But I'm not sure what he decided. I can open the Porcello bet again this year for those interested. It could be sign bet for a month or a case of beer or something just to make it interesting and fun. The rules would be the same but it would only apply for those who are regular posters and have at least 3000 posts --Hitchi already own me and I haven't seen him again LOL!
  18. LOL! I thought you were on my side MVP, what happened man? Hahaha Anyways, it still too early to know. Thus far his tenure in Boston is still lamentable -overall. On the other hand he has shown in recent games an improvement, but again vs the weakest team in baseball and vs NYY who are struggling. We need at least a season. IMO, He isn't an ace. He isn't even a a true NO. 2. His ceiling IMO is 4.0 ERA i.e. Decent No. 3. Reallistacally? No.4-5. We'll see though.
  19. Anyone can talk about whatever they pleased to, just like U? does with other topics over and over again. Not sure why it irritates him. Funny thing is that he doesn't point out other users that talk about Cherington, like sk in this case.
  20. Also, no one is whining. Take it easy.
  21. So no one can talk about Cherington anymore? Hahaha Why does it irritate you when someone talks about him? Time to time the topic will come up, live with it or simply ignore it.
  22. IMO a 330 OBP player is good enough to leadoff. Of course you also want good baserunning, and if he has decent power even better. Betts is oks leadingoff. JBJ could be a good option If he struggles at some point.
×
×
  • Create New...