Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Palodios

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    14,089
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Palodios

  1. My preference is CB, but yeah, a low-floor high-ceiling SP signing would be great.
  2. Chad Billingsley is an interesting name out there today. 3.65 Career ERA, GB% in the high 40s, K/9 in the 8-9s, innings usually in the 200 range. Two significant elbow surgeries over the last two years is scary, but if he's healthy and available for only a few mill, he could be a steal.
  3. I just want to point out that Koji's career WHIP is the lowest for any player with 200+ IP at 0.85. The next on the list is Kimbrel at .90. He had been very effective for his career -- the problem has always been health.
  4. It worked out because the bullpen was built in a way that it could endure multiple injuries. Koji's K/BB was historically good before coming to Boston-- there is something about having pinpoint control that can make a pitcher thrive. Look at his WHIP from the 4 previous years -- 0.64, 0.78, 0.70, 0.95. The guy just never gave up base runners.
  5. The Red Sox built a bullpen with several excellent relief options that year. Andrew Bailey, Jack Hanrahan, Koji Uehara, Tazawa, Andrew Miller. Three guys with closer potential had season ending injuries. That was simply excellent-team-building that went well in some places and poorly in others. If you're going to point to guys going ham, you're looking at the wrong sources. Felix Doubront's streak of consistency, Iglesias hitting like a major leaguer, Victorino being a beast, and Ellsbury staying healthy were pretty incredible.
  6. There is something pretty awful about trading a player who took a gigantic paycut to play for you. He's a franchise player, and that means things that transcend past pure ability. Also, the average tenure of Red Sox players is 2-3 years, and I am surprised that it hasn't become a problem for attendance.
  7. Ben just said that the Red Sox are done looking for significant rotation upgrades. Sadpal.
  8. Swihart is MLB.com's #1 catching prospect for 2015.
  9. The Phillies seem to have been burned by the lengthy free agencies of Shields and Scherzer. If those guys were signed in December, Hamels would be a lot easier to move. It doesn't help that Amaro wants the farm.
  10. I actually screwed up those numbers. That's his career line against boston. Here's his Fenway line: 74 IP, 5.42 ERA, 1.45 WHIP. Not good.
  11. The Shields market took an interesting turn recently, according to both Bob Nightengale and Jayson Stark. Several teams are back in on Shields, but are "bottom-feeding" and putting out 80 million dollar offers. At that rate, there is no reason why the Red Sox shouldn't be in on him.
  12. The Red Sox's entire rotation is righthanders, and all of their top tier starting prospects are lefthanders.
  13. I was reading that Washington doesn't have an income tax for people working there who don't live there. So, he'll save 10s of millions there alone.
  14. Sox pursuing Zimmerman. We'll see.
  15. It seems like this is a good example of two teams knowing what their prospects were worth. The Red Sox wouldn't send Lester, meanwhile the Tigers were perfectly fine trading Andrew Miller, a guy who was better regarded at the time. And even if the Sox traded Lester straight up for Miggy, I think most of us would have all done it anyway.
  16. Dontrelle Willis is still bouncing around the minors apparently, coming on with the Brewers now. I still can't believe Lester's name was in trade talks for him all those years ago.
  17. It is money manipulation. Instead of paying 28 million every year, they are paying 14 million each year, and 14 million 7 years from that year. 7 years later, that money is worth much less -- it makes the contract look like a 180 million dollar contract instead of a 210 million contract. I also want to point out that the MLB grew 13% last year.
  18. This guy gets it.
  19. How is that different than here ? Obviously less extreme, but the sides are general well defined. Fellowship of the Miserable has a good ring to it.
  20. I can't stop seeing Buchholz as the big red flag for the team. He's about as unreliable as they come. I'm fine with the rest of the rotation being #2/3/4 quality pitchers, but Buchholz has the potential to be the worst starter in the MLB. He also has the potential to be among the best, but I don't see that happening.
  21. My concern is that the #6 and #7 starters on the depth chart usually end up getting 15-20 starts. They haven't built a buffer between the starters and the prospects. The Red Sox were very loud on most pitchers back in November, but haven't had their name thrown around at all lately-- it sounds like they are done.
  22. The Red Sox FO made a big deal about how they depended too much on prospects in 2014, and it led to the downfall. This year, they are depending too much on their pitching prospects. Most of their new signings have been very healthy, but Buchholz is always a disaster, and you never know when bad luck will strike.
  23. It seems crazy to me individuals can agree with the FO's moves at the time, and then years later bash those same moves, despite hailing them at the time. It's like some of us assume the FO has a crystal ball and is a failure for not seeing into the future.
  24. Odorizzi is not in Owens class. Based on where he is ranked, he'd be worth a Ranaudo or Barnes. Clearly valuable pieces, but not in that upper group.
  25. Quite the opposite. Getting Gallardo for a middling prospect and pieces seemed like a small haul to me.
×
×
  • Create New...