Emmz
-
Posts
11,403 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Emmz
-
Those are like the best things in life except for sex and drugs, which I very seldom discuss. So like I said, top quality s***.
-
Narcissism isn't consistent with BPD. So why do you think I'm boderline? I'm emotionally consistent, my thinking is very complex, and I'm not impulsive at all, I'm compulsive. that's like the worst diagnosis I've ever heard.
-
Yes, I post top quality s***. We all know this.
-
Also, I'm cynical, not depressed. I can be hella positive, you should try it sometime.
-
This is the sports forum, and a thread about athletes. Why would I post a song here?
-
Cracka you seriouz? You must be delusional if you don't agree with me.
-
Ahaha, right after I assert my belief that you're delusional, you call me delusional. Good times.
-
If that helps you cope with me running you off the site, and making you look pretty stupid on multiple occasions, then congratulations on your moral vic. As to people finding me annoying, I'd be offended if that held any merit. Most people speak positively of me and realize that I'm opinionated and make some good points. If anything, you're the delusional broad with a chip on her shoulder.
-
Cherrington Huge Mistake not Getting J. Upton via trade and extension
Emmz replied to Softlaw's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
Yeah, he's Ben, I'm Larry, welcome to the front office, pal. -
Hold it, you know, your short and irritating posting style reminds me of someone who's been here before. Edit: Gotcha. def SemperFi Sox. And someone else, too.
-
How's that? Edit: Anyways, doc, as much as I appreciate the amateur pathology diagnosis, I have to say that you're way way off. Not that giving psycho-analysis based on text isn't completely laughable or anything. Ps: Let's try figuring out the difference between anger and contempt before throwing out new terms above our heads, shall we?
-
The ones I don't much care for.
-
You must learn the difference between anger and contempt. How's that grab ya?
-
All he said was that it's a PR move. Definitely is, too. We've yet to see what he can actually bring to the table, if anything.
-
Slept fine last night dawg. Hbu?
-
"im rubber ur glu watever u say 2 me bounces off n hits u".
-
What? That doesn't even make sense. I get "called out" a lot, so I need to worry about myself? How do you figure?
-
^Funny coming from you. Sad mess, you should worry about yourself more.
-
I never said anyone was wrong anyways, just making that clear. As for your point, being right the wrong way just means that you think you're right. If you can't formulate a good, thoughtful response with support, then while you might not be wrong, that's how it's going to seem. It is totally subjective, I could argue Tiger Woods or Michael Jordan, but I pickes Bo Jackson because it's obvious by the eye test that he was just natural at everything. I also used some stats, and that'll be that. I don't seek to change anyone's mind, I'm really just trying to make a case for Jackson. I think Thorpe's case is as good as anyone's, and I've said that like 3 times.
-
Absolutely agree, and you still kinda have to have respect for what they did, it's not easy to ever be as dominant as Gretzky was. I can't say I knew that, I always assumed he was the greatest because he has pretty much every record. Everything is advancing all the time. Look at the NFL, the 73 Dolphins or 85 Bears couldn't beat the 08 Lions. I still have to respect that, because they were also working with primitive schemes, etc. I don't necessarily feel athletes/teams lose points for that.
-
This. So much this. Kinda actually touched on the subjectivity of the thing twice, but this puts it perfectly. The nature of a disagreement/debate/argument is that you think you're right. I don't feel these topics are totally pointless, but I don't mind discussions like this.
-
1. Dude, like two people have said I'm wrong. chill 2. You still haven't provided evidence, you're trying to maintain this "you're wrong, but I'm going to avoid making any valid points and just continue talking out of my ass" attitude. You should be the last person to make a "waaah you're dismissive claim". 3. I've posted a link of Thorpe's terrible major league baseball stats.. You've shown me what exactly?
-
You've yet to provide this so-called plentiful evidence that gives him an edge. Olympics? As far as I'm concerned it's because he did't compete. In the sports they both competed in, he was better (athletically, statistically, easily) at both sports. So Thorpe won in the olympics, Bo never went. You keep saying that the talent level at the olympics is elite. Baseball and football aren't consisting of elite talent? What makes that a supposedly better argument? I'd say that the NFL and MLB are consisting of even more elite talent if anything. Bo Jackson was an elite amongst elites in both leagues.
-
The amount of sports you can play=athletic ability then? Stats don't even need to factor into it. Bo Jackson is such a freak of nature he almost seems like just an urban legend. I'm just using stats because they're there. They're physical, and not just subjective opinion. They're comparable.
-
We have a sample size of two sports to compare them, and Jackson was better at both. It's that easy to understand.
