I just wanted to go over this. I disagree with this, in the sense that this somehow is supposed to tarnish LaRussa as a manager or somehow put Francona over the top. LaRussa is so much more proven, he's won on different teams over a long period of time, that means rebuilding. Francona has won two worlds series basically because he was handed a job that was a guaranteed success, the Red Sox were a very competitive team, and they still are. Francona has not had to rebuild much yet. I think once he proves himself by actually going through several teams, he will then have somewhat of a case (possibly) with LaRussa. However, it's just to early to put him even in the same sentence.
Also, I recall back in the 2004 playoffs Francona made one of the silliest errors a manager could make, he put a very tired Pedro Martinez in, while the Red Sox were dominating. I had no idea why he would do that, but he did, and there was no reason for it. I'm just saying, if you're going to compare someone to LaRussa, I wouldn't pick Francona