The folks upstairs can influence the performance on the field, by their selection of the players and by the team's style. For example, the Red Sox have shown in recent years a disdain for stealing bases (while allowing their opponents to steal them blind), and a propensity for their hitters to be up there swinging away--instead of allowing the situation to dictate the strategy. This prompted one ex-player announcing a game to say they weren't playing as a team in spite of their considerable talent (when AdGon and Crawford were playing). This style of behavior can only have come from upstairs--at the manager level or higher. Perhaps Tito had his hands tied. We don't know. We do know that conflict between the FO and the manager is common--who to play on the field and how to play.
Farrell was asked yesterday in an interview why Ellsbury hadn't even attempted a stolen base in ST so far.
He didn't give a straight answer. Said you might expect more during the season. Last year, Ells stole only 17 bases--below his career frequency based on PAs. Could be he is a bit gunshy on the basepaths following his injury on the ground at 2B. Farrell's Toronto team was 5th in SBs last year (Red Sox were 10th), so you would expect more SB emphasis this year, especially with Victorino and maybe Bradley in the lineup. Plus Pedey, who will get his 20 SBs. Hopefully, Farrell will get his way on this--the team as constituted needs to move baserunners better to generate more runs for its questionable pitching. The starting pitching has looked good in ST so far, but that may be just a mirage. Relying just on the long ball
won't get them far.