While I agree that Buchholz's numbers may be a little exaggerated due to the incredibly futility represented in a mere 2-3 starts, they cannot be ignored. Sure, on an aggregate level, even while including those horrific starts, his numbers are very f***** good. However, combining those 2 starts with some of his select starts from last year shows that he still has the ability to get his s*** pushed in.
I do like how he's been pitching and he shows great promise for future years, especially considering the fact that he's 24-25. With that said, we should probably wait until he has more than 200 career innings (and perhaps more than 200 innings in a season) before we herald him as the next big thing. Simply put, as much as I'd love to ignore those other starts as outliers, they did happen nonetheless. You can say "if he didn't have those 2 starts his ERA would be 2.11", but that's like saying "if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle"