Jump to content
Our MLB mock draft board has updated! Who do we have the Red Sox taking with the 20th pick? ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

mvp 78

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    82,675

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    205

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mvp 78

  1. mvp 78
    They are typically meaningless as they are rarely taken.
  2. mvp 78
    I wonder at what point they increase that $ per win.
  3. mvp 78
    There is a 19M mutual option as well.
  4. mvp 78
    They are both rehabbing in Ft Myers right now and have had no setbacks YET. I'd still wait and see what it looks like in ST.
  5. mvp 78
    The only curse was us having to deal with Dan Shaughnessy.
  6. mvp 78
    In Kutter's defense, around the time you start your sample, Kutter closes in on his career high in IP. A falloff is kind of expected at that point. Kutter through 29 starts: 161 IP, 4.08 ERA, 149 K, 44 BB, 4.63 FIP Bello full season (30 starts): 162.1 IP, 4.49 ERA, 153 K, 64 BB, 4.19 FIP Post ASB: Kutter 4 QS Bello 5 QS It's very close, but my worry is about Bello's bb rate (7th highest for pitchers with IP > 150 in 2024). Crawford's HR/9 was astronomical, but I believe that number is less elastic than bb rate.
  7. mvp 78
    I think they may trade for a Catcher. They do need late inning relief help, but I'm worried they'll just rely on sliding Whitlock into the 7-8-9 innings with Hendriks/Champan/Slaten. I'm not concerned about the RHB aspect.
  8. mvp 78
    I don't know if they "know they are going in with a lowball offer" or if they just have a value in mind and refuse to budge on it for certain players. Soto made them get a little uncomfortable and stretch their bidding. Lots of risk with a long term Fried contract IMO.
  9. mvp 78
    I don't find bref to be mobile friendly either. I think both of them do the bare minimum to be modern websites.
  10. mvp 78
    On Fulmer, it's hard to be worried about a guy signed on a two year minor league deal. Only upside with those moves IMO.
  11. mvp 78
    My counter argument is that about 50% of FA signings just don't work out, even the expensive ones. No matter what, it's a bit of a gamble. However, the cheaper signings are low risk/low reward.
  12. mvp 78
    Closer by throwing spaghetti at the wall and seeing when it finally sticks.
  13. mvp 78
    We all saw how the bullpen fared down the stretch last season. Maybe the additional arms can help fix that?
  14. mvp 78
    Good stat. I should put it in a post.
  15. mvp 78
    He must REALLY not like Buehler.
  16. mvp 78
    Criswell's 99 innings need to be replaced and Pivetta's 145. I think it can be done. If anyone is out, Kutter can pick up the slack. Defense is the same for now. Bregman is not going to HOU. Maybe his price drops and he signs here?
  17. mvp 78
    *goes and checks his splits on FanGraphs* Home at SF: 632 OPS Away from SF: 852 OPS Oh...
  18. mvp 78
    I don't understand the Conforto signing. Do they think his numbers will pop leaving SF?
  19. mvp 78
    At least it's something different!
  20. mvp 78
    The Dodgers rotation is Glasnow, Yamamoto, Snell, Stone, Gonsolin, Miller, May (LOL), Ohtani (???). I think they signed Snell to replace Buehler's spot.
  21. mvp 78
    What about a 26 man IL?
  22. mvp 78
    I didn’t know there was any other use?
  23. mvp 78
    Lots of ifs the past few years. Maybe they can shore it up the pen over the remainder of the winter? On paper, this rotation is much better than last seasons and the 2024 version was solid per fWAR.
  24. mvp 78
    Getting multiple years of Verdugo and Wong for one year of Betts was actually a win. 🙎‍♂️🔫
  25. mvp 78
    I specifically left those two out because of Old Red’s propensity to throw “suspects” around.
×
×
  • Create New...