mvp 78
-
Posts
82,627 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
203
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by mvp 78
-
Doesn't matter. He won't respond back anyway...
-
That's not how this place works. Any post is fair game for commenting.
-
Panic had nothing to do with it. When you are in last place and the fans no longer care about your product, what is your boss supposed to do? Give you a participation ribbon?
-
"Hey guys, the couch in the locker room sucks. Mind if I run to Cardi's and buy a new one?"
-
When you can't develop viable starting pitchers, they need to be acquired via trade or free agency. If they really thought that Porcello was going to outperform Lester, I'm glad they made big changes to the FO.
-
The future ramification of Pablo starting and tanking for 2 months is Farrell potentially losing his job and the Sox falling so far behind that they wind up in last place again.
-
Craig is not taking up space. He's helping to pick up bar tabs for the AAA guys. He's not in the way of anyone.
-
Plus, Pablo was given a fair chance. He was given all of last year and he ending up being a -2 WAR player and the worst fulltime positional player in the bigs.
-
Where was I griping about Ben?
-
I wouldn't buy a beer for Thunder either. 1. He wouldn't drink it. 2. I don't need to get a police record because of Talksox.
-
None of us here think we're keyboard warriors. As others have said numerous times, we just talk as if we're shooting the s*** at the bar before a game. 99.9% of the time the posts aren't personal and it's not meant to be taken seriously.
-
Every sportswriter in the world writes for the audience. Shaughnessy writes to get his audience riled up. McAdam, Abraham, et al write to give the audience perspective on what is going on in the clubhouse. Gammons writes to get his audience more informed about the on-field product. If a writer wrote just to amuse himself, he'd probably be out of job really quick.
-
I agree with your take. That is all.
-
Of those 5, realistically only Moncada and Beninturdi should be shagging fly balls. We'll need a 1b and 3b next year, so moving Shaw and Travis around is a waste. Swihart still needs to be kept at C until it's determined that Vazquez is the guy.
-
I don't think they'd do that. They'd be SOL if an OF got injured and would have too much IF redundancy. They need to have at least 5 people on the roster (excluding Shaw) that can play OF. If they demoted Castillo, they'd only have 4.
-
Beninturdi will be in the OF in 2 years (maybe sooner). Holt and a platoon can get by for that long.
-
Only 1b professionally.
-
Imo, we aren't clogged and have shown no issues with being clogged. There is no guy on the AAA roster that is blocked that would be on the opening day roster otherwise. David Murphy was let go because they don't want 5 OFers who can't play any IF. It's a waste of a roster spot. Honestly, the difference between Castillo and Murphy at this point is very slim. Being willing to put anyone on the bench no matter the salary will prevent them from any clogging issues. We're not clogged in the rotation. We're not clogged in the bullpen. Where's the clog?
-
Brian Mitchell out 3 months with fractured toe.
-
He signed with the Mets for 5.75M this offseason. Murphy was brought in for $2M if he made the team.
-
Considering the rotation and bullpen question marks, it's not indefensible to use an extra slot on an arm.
-
Whether he was on the field or not, they saw his work ethic, how he performed in practice, etc.
-
Semantics. By not offering him an MLB deal, they pretty much released him.
-
And some teams have been burned by sticking with veterans for too long.
-
This is fairly solid reasoning. Maybe they were worried that a move to AAA would hurt future trade potential? Idk.
