Fallacy.
As constructed now, the goal of this team is consistency.
Consistent starting rotation with the big three followed by three guys who can give you above-average innings from the four and five spot in the rotation. That is a luxury that not many teams in baseball have.
Consistent bullpen, even though not as strong as last year's.
Your notion of "consistency" on offense is both ignorant and misguided. The Red Sox scored a ton of "garbage" runs last year because they were offensively dominant at home but pathetic on the road, and that's what they intended to address this off-season. Whether your hunch tells you otherwise, the 2010 Sox, health permitting, should be a much more consistent home/road offense, though not as explosive as the 2009 home version of the Red Sox, there is plenty of thump up and down the lineup, and more importantly, no auto-outs. Hell, even the bench is greatly improved, but i'm sure your hunches don't take that into account.
This is why you don't run a team.
First off, that is a lie.
Ellsbury, Pedroia, Cameron and Scutaro are all guys who have wheels. Although Cameron and Scutaro don't have blazing speed, they can steal a base and help dynamize the offense.
Second off, you can't steal first base. If you don't get on base, you can't run, and you can't score.
Read this slowly:
To score runs, you need to get on base.
Oh you're obviously correct, that AB from Jason Varitek defined the Red Sox' 2009 season, not the fact that they scored almost 900 runs and made the playoffs.
Besides that, isn't that guy......what's his name? Martinez catching now? Oh yeah, that guy who hits .300 every year, gets on base and hits for power, yeah, that guy.
Logic. Use it.