No he's not. I've watched him as well. He's a great defensive CF, but it's just not realistic that he can save that many runs. You're saying a CF can save more runs than a SS or 2B?
Irrespective...you're missing the point. These players were considered NEGATIVE. They were WORSE than the league average. Get it? The metric is useless, and you quote it as fact...which is par for the course for a lot of posters here.
Back to the original argument...I don't deny that Cano is a step below Pedroia defensively. Your metric [sic] agrees to that. However, offensively, Cano is better.
According to fangraphs, Pedroia is worth about 15.8 runs. Cano is worth 23.9. I'm not even sure how these numbers are calculated, but it seems to be in the ballpark. I give the nod to Pedroia, maybe 6 or 7 runs, defensively. That puts Cano slightly ahead of Pedroia...which is what I've said all along.
Of course, if you wish to stick to a metric that has Tex, Adam Jones, and Torii Hunter as below average defensively, and Gutierriez as the most important defensive player in the game irrespective of position, that is your prerogative. I just doubt that anyone will take your point seriously. I don't.