Let's see...
Lackey signed for 82.5 million.
Cameron signed for 15.5 million
Beltre signed for 10 million.
However, Bay signed for 66 million.
Yet...you claim that the Red Sox signed Lackey, Cameron, and Beltre for the money it cost to sign Bay. How is this even remotely mathematically possible?
Can you explain this? ONLY WHEN USING DIPRE LOGIC!
I can't really buy the whole "don't trust his knees" when they sign Lackey, who has spent more time on the DL by far than Bay has. Honestly, I have no desire to make you look like a fool. Just realize that you're not making sense on this one.