Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

KeepTheFaith1229

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,084

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by KeepTheFaith1229

  1. KeepTheFaith1229
    Who knows? Someone from some foreign country could be discovered and brought to the MLB.
  2. KeepTheFaith1229
    I agree with pretty much everything you said here except for the part where you said the Cards are a playoff lock. The Cardinals are a great ballclub, no questioning that. I just don't know about this year. The team is aging a little bit. They'll probably have trouble staying healthy as they did last year. They have basically missed out on every target they had this offseason, and have lost several key components. (Grudzielanek, Sanders, Walker, Nunez, etc.) Also, in their division they have a 2005 world series participant that beat them in the NLCS. Houston now knows that they can beat St. Louis. Also in their division are the Cubs, who have improved this offseason, and I don't expect Mark Prior to be hit with another liner. Yet another strong team in their division is Milwaukee, a team on the upswing. I know St. Louis has their big guns, Pujols, Rolen, Edmonds, Mulder...I just don't know about this year. They will undoubtedly be competitive, but I wouldn't say they're a lock.
  3. KeepTheFaith1229
    Argh, I wish I was in this. I like Pittsburgh and Seattle.
  4. KeepTheFaith1229
    Wow. That doesn't make sense at all. Maybe it's because Beckett has had trouble keeping healthy recently so the price is lowered. But still...
  5. KeepTheFaith1229
    My bad, I thought he was older than that. About the lineup...I don't think we should bat him leadoff (if we get him), I would rather see him in the 5 hole where he can drive in some runs. Also, in the five hole, he is sort of the 2nd leadoff hitter, because the person that leads off the most innings besides the leadoff man is the 5th batter. I really want to see what Youk can do leading off. If Youkilis was to faulter in the leadoff role, then maybe Edmonds could step in.
  6. KeepTheFaith1229
    They have also posted on the site that the Cardinals are shopping Jim Edmonds around and the Sox are interested. If it's true, I'd be thrilled. Edmonds is 38, but a gold glover in CF and has a 35-100 stick. He would be a perfect 2 year solution until Ellsbury is ready. What do you guys think St. Louis would take in return?
  7. KeepTheFaith1229
    Mark Loretta shouldn't hit leadoff. IMO, he's the best 2-hole hitter in baseball. Youkilis should hit leadoff. He'd have a crazy high OBP and set the table for Manny and Papi.
  8. KeepTheFaith1229
    I agree, Krazee. P.S. I'm pretty sure ORS has my vote for most knowledgeable member.
  9. KeepTheFaith1229
    Hahaha, they must have just read that, because I looked on the site right now and it now says the Seattle Times.
  10. KeepTheFaith1229
    Yes, he probably could if we needed him to, given his decent OBP, .291 avg., and 18 stolen bases. However, I would prefer Youkilis to hit leadoff because he would do the best job of setting the table for Manny, Papi, and Tek.
  11. KeepTheFaith1229
    How can you say that? In what was his first full year in the majors Peralta's numbers compare to Jeter's (2005 stats) like this: Peralta: 24 HR, 78 RBI, .292 avg., .366 OBP Jeter: 19 HR, 70 RBI, .309 avg., .389 OBP How can you say he'll never be as good as Jeter, when his numbers are already similar to Jeter's and Peralta still has upside? To say he would be a Guzman or Cabrera is ridiculous. He's already a monumentally better hitter than both of them. Also, if you're talking about now, the Sox need a shortstop, which Peralta is. So yes, I would trade Marte for Peralta.
  12. KeepTheFaith1229
    Is there a separate thing for the Super Bowl??
  13. KeepTheFaith1229
    My bad. You're right.
  14. KeepTheFaith1229
    Dude, there's definitely something wrong with those stats. This is you. [ATTACH]325[/ATTACH]
  15. KeepTheFaith1229
    Why would you try to figure that out yourself?? His career BAA is .281. Okay? I have to go now.
  16. KeepTheFaith1229
    http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/5103/career;_ylt=AgjmPeKbyrY8O.mB68OAKpSFCLcF Also, his ERA is greatly inflated because in 1994 he pitched one game and ended with an ERA of 21.60
  17. KeepTheFaith1229
    Where the hell are you getting this .354 BAA?!?!?!!?
  18. KeepTheFaith1229
    Wow. Career BAA of .354!?!? Where did you get that?? It's actually .281. Next time you're going to burn someone, at least get his stats right.
  19. KeepTheFaith1229
    Jeeze laweeze, 218 yards for Smith! They should have had more double coverages and more Nathan Vasher.
  20. KeepTheFaith1229
    I'll be back next week.
  21. KeepTheFaith1229
    Errrr.....errrrrrrr.........
  22. KeepTheFaith1229
    Looks like they're not going to need two defensive touchdowns.
  23. KeepTheFaith1229
    Felipe Lopez! (say it with expression and it's kind of...weird) EDIT: Grady Sizemore maybe?
  24. KeepTheFaith1229
    I don't know, but he's not worth that. If that was the case I'd rather trade for a guy like Roberts or Payton.
  25. KeepTheFaith1229
    How many more years until Ellsbury is ready do you guys think?
×
×
  • Create New...