I have some family in Florida. My niece was a Marlins season ticket holder for a number of years. It's not like their fans are tolerant of losing in contrast to the "entitled" Red Sox fans. In the Marlins comparatively short history, they have won two championships. And guess what, in years that they stink (which is most years) their fans say so. And because their fanbase sucks balls, they completely abandon the team. If they are not winning, their fans don't go to the games and they stop following the team.
So, who are the "entitled" fans-- the so-called "fans" in these half-assed small markets that don't even go to games when they can get 4 tickets, 4 hot dogs and 4 drinks for $40? The Red Sox fans fill that old relic Fenway game after game for huge bucks, and when they can't get there, they loyally follow them every game on TV, radio, gamecast or by other means. Entitled? Loyal is a better description. Unfortunately, along with having a large loyal and knowledgeable fanbase comes the fact there are millions of fans can discern good baseball from bad baseball, good players from bad players etc. Even the best teams have faults and weaknesses. The weaknesses will always be what is debated. No one needs to debate the strengths. There probably aren't a lot of interesting threads from Angels fans about Mike Trout. First post: "He's great" No other posts. Close the thread.