Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    70,398

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. a700hitter
    Where was that pitch?
  2. a700hitter
    Fat man still not looking good with the glove, and he had a big k earlier in the game with 2 runners on and no one out.
  3. a700hitter
    He was worth the prospect cost and his salary in this market is very cheap. Moncada struck me as an airhead especially when he got picked off first base in September. http://www.masslive.com/redsox/index.ssf/2016/09/yoan_moncada_boston_red_sox_st_1.html
  4. a700hitter
    A perfect example of how stats can be misleading. The rest of that staff was a bunch of nobodies.
  5. a700hitter
    Neither side can prove or disprove.
  6. a700hitter
    Great to start off with a win! Benintendi got on top of and mashed a big time (98 mph) heater. Porcello picked up right where he left off last year.
  7. a700hitter
    I am often silly.
  8. a700hitter
    I like the lefthanded hitter there to use the first base - second base hole, but of course we know that such an advantage doesn't exist in the random world of baseball.
  9. a700hitter
    I believe that it was Farrell who made the BMI remark last year.
  10. a700hitter
    I have seen hitters give away ABs without any doubt. Do people remember the night that Manny was called in to PH against Mo on a Sunday night that was supposed to be his night off and took 3 pitches right down the pipe for a 3 pitch strikeout. Over a full season, lots of ABs are given up. If it is getaway day and the game is out of hand, players are not bearing down as hard.
  11. a700hitter
    To me, clutch = choking less than your competitors.
  12. a700hitter
    But choking does...right?
  13. a700hitter
    That's because you have no hair on your head. The hair on the back of your neck is standing out of fear that it is endangered like the former hairs on your head.
  14. a700hitter
    No, it couldn't be homerism.
  15. a700hitter

    Espn

    a700hitter replied to bosoxmal's topic in Other Baseball

    If I had the choice to save money by leaving it off my cable subscription, it already would have been gone from my home for years.
  16. a700hitter
    SOunds like a good definition to me.
  17. a700hitter
    If the definitions are not accepted, the research that hasn't definitively disproved those definitions is pointless, imo. Yes, I will continue to maintain that.
  18. a700hitter
    Rutledge just pulled up lame on the bases. Marco Hernandez may make the big club for Opening Day.
  19. a700hitter

    Espn

    a700hitter replied to bosoxmal's topic in Other Baseball

    ESPN is garbage. I prefer to watch with the sound off.
  20. a700hitter
    Let's trade Castillo and Craig and Panda and their salaries straight up for Ben.
  21. a700hitter
    You have said it yourself that the studies do not definitively disprove the existence of clutch... or are you changing your position?
  22. a700hitter
    I said "if". Others have said that the term can't be defined to their satisfaction.
  23. a700hitter
    I think the data in the studies could not prove clutch. It did not definitively disprove clutch.
  24. a700hitter
    Don't lose sight of the fact that the research doesn't disprove anything, and the fact that there is no agreement on the definition also makes the research irrelevant and pointless. None of this makes the concept of clutch a fallacy. It just invalidates all of the studies.
  25. a700hitter
    That conclusion is fallacious. Also, none of the statistical studies definitively disprove even the disputed definitions of clutch.
×
×
  • Create New...