Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    70,398

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. a700hitter
    I heard that Gabbard was sent out today. Was he DFA'd?
  2. a700hitter
    Everything with you is an extreme. Who said buy superstars? Smart spending doesn't necessarily mean superstars, but you can't wait for the farm to fill out a roster. Which team is it with the smart FO that has all of its starters, position players and relievers from its farm system? The answer is none. Every team has to fill gaps. It's done through trades or FA's. Find me a competitive team that doesn't have players that it signed as FA's or got in trades.
  3. a700hitter
    If the Sox had Abreu and not the Yankees, the Sox would have been pummuling the Yankees in the Ponson game. The Yankee pitching was nothing special in at least two of those games, but the Red Sox didn't have the guns to take advantage. The Yankees did. In the last game, a single key hit could have turned that game. He most definitely could have made a difference in two or three of those games. He would have added some key hits for the Red Sox, and his absence from the Yankee lineup would have given the Red Sox pitching some key outs.
  4. a700hitter
    Nice catch by Crisp-- a webgem, even though it might have been a trap. He's just not consistent out there.
  5. a700hitter
    Yeah that's what teams do to fill gaps if they want to contend. The idea is to keep the good prospects and trade the lesser ones. Should the FO wait for the AA boys to be ready to assume rotation spots? Is your solution is to go with a three man rotation until the farm yields a crop? That doesn't sound to practical. Are you defending the Red Sox spending record. They have the second highest payroll in baseball. Their problem is not that they don't spend enough money. The problem is that they don't spend their money smart enough. I advocate spending to get value not to get garbage. The FO has been buying too much garbage recently. They are really doing something wrong to spend so much money and be so bad.
  6. a700hitter
    Carlos Pena with another strikeout. If he and Wily Mo play full time next year, they could set some record for K's by guys with same surname in the same lineup.
  7. a700hitter
    Like Matsui and Sheffield?
  8. a700hitter
    He can only pitch once, but that's not my point. That's your point. My point is that a strong rotation of 5 is more important than a single closer. If you only have one good pitcher, you are going to stink whether he is a starter or reliever.
  9. a700hitter
    Like it is now? I think some serious discussions are going on in the FO about the mistakes they have made. This team is playing worse than any Red Sox team since 2001 and before that 1992. I realize that you have never said that you like collecting prospects. That would be a ridiculous generalization of your posts. Similarly, I don't advocate spending money just for the sake of spending money. I think they should spend to get value. Throwing $24 million at Clement was foolish as was spending $21 million for one year of Reneteria. For an additional $3 million, they could have had O Cab for 4 years. Please make a little effort to analyze the contents of each post and stop resorting to sweeping generalizations. It's foolish and lazy.
  10. a700hitter
    I think it is easier to find a single closer than to find two or three top starters.
  11. a700hitter
    The 2002 Angels bullpen did not just have a dominant closer. Their bullpen was 4 or 5 deep with shut down stuff.
  12. a700hitter
    Pena, more garbage discarded by other teams. How many teams have dumped him.
  13. a700hitter
    Exactly, the yankees had both a strong rotation and the lights out closer. If the Yankees had a bunch of 5 inning pitchers they would not have been able to get to MO with the lead enough. Teams have been able to win without a Mo-type closer if they have strong starters, but I don't know of many teams to win with a lights-out closer and a weak rotation.
  14. a700hitter
    Yeah, you go root for Florida. They love collecting prospects for stars.
  15. a700hitter
    If your starters eat a lot of innings, the good arms in the bullpen will not be overworked and the lesser arms will not have to be relied upon in crucial situations. You'll still need some good arms in the bullpen, but you won't need to be as deep simply because there would be less innings for the Pen to pitch. With a strong rotation, you can get away with 3 reliable arms in the pen and 3 mop-up types. If the Starters are bad or 5 inning starters, you need to be 5 deep with good arms in the Pen.
  16. a700hitter
    Who thought we could get Schilling until it happened or Beckett in this offseason? The FO has to be creative and willing to part with prospects and $ and they can land a top guy to go along with Schilling, Beckett and Papelbon. Also, I agree with Fred that Crisp has to go this offseason. The FO has to sell the idea that the injury was the problem, and let's hope that he has a strong September. If they keep him for another year the other teams will figure out what Cleveland already knew-- that Crisp has reached his ceiling and that he is a horrendous center fielder.
  17. a700hitter
    Freddy Sanchez numbers:lol: Let's not forget the gold gloves that he was awarded even though he has no range. I can see the witers giving the award to Jeter. It really wouldn't surprise me. If they could give him two gold gloves even though he has two step range, they can give him an MVP.
  18. a700hitter
    Add one more stopper to '03 and '05 and they do win three straight. Part of the '04 formula was having two stoppers to prevent extended losing streaks. It also served them well in the post season. The '07 team will go nowhere unless they really bolster the rotation. I don't see them shelling out the big bucks for more than one starter. If paps is a stopper type starter, a rotation of Schilling, papelbon, Beckett, FA and Wakefield would eat innings and cover up alot of bullpen deficiencies.
  19. a700hitter
    Well, Foulke just ruined whatever little trade value he may have had.
  20. a700hitter
    Is this a frightening glimpse of the future of a team without Ortiz or Manny?
  21. a700hitter
    Lopez is a big waste. Who the hell will offer him a contract next year?
  22. a700hitter
    Maybe he's a catcher and not a pitcher.
  23. a700hitter
    Looked like Bradley trapped the ball, but he shielded it and sold it to the Umps.
  24. a700hitter
    Speaking of next year, they have a lot of holes to fill for 2007. The need two starters, a retooled bullpen (only Papelbon and MDC are keepers), a reliable #5 hitter, serviceable backup catcher for Tek whose body is starting to wear out. What is on the horizon for this team. Other than Pedroia replacing Loretta, what help can they get from inside the organization that is ready to compete at the ML level? How much payroll will be available for the FA market.
  25. a700hitter
    Nice play by Cora for the DP.
×
×
  • Create New...