In the end, Francona was good enough. This sums it up perfectly:
Francona, overall, was a good manager. He led the team to a championship. I made this thread not to judge his baseball managerial capabilities, but to comment on his handling of players. For the longest time (indeed, before he even came to Boston) he has had the reputation of being a softee. The article kind of tones that soft Francona image down. He isn't maybe the 100% nice guy we thought, even though he may show it on the outside, which is good and necessary.
As for judging managers on individual decisions, I agree that you can't. You have to take the whole season in context, and overall Francona earns an A (and a ring ). Grady had the misfortune of making one of the worst possible managerial moves in history, which was enough to ruin him in Boston. Barring catastrophe, it should take more than a few blunders such as Francona made this past season to warrant extreme criticism.
For some reason I wrote this post in a very, very bizarre style.. Oh well. :dunno: