Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

What's the single biggest question facing the Sox heading into Spring Training?

 

I'm saying Ortiz. Even if our pitching and defense doesn't live up to expectations, this team is still going to give up very few runs, especially on the road. Offense is clearly the question and I think Ortiz is the biggest factor there. If he snaps out of it (or starts juicing again....) this team will be unbeatable. If not, expect a lot of 1-1 or 1-2 nailbiters going into the 6th or 7th...

Posted
Got to agree 100% with this. Ortiz needs to have bounce back year in a big way. We need 30+ home runs from him this year and can't afford him to go through long stretches of nothingness this year. He is one of the few keys this offense has in terms of being a power threat. Another question is how will Dice-K bounce back. Another two are how will Papelbon do this year, will he bounce back to what he used to be or will he continue to trend downward and slide from last years performance? Lastly, when and where will Mike Lowell be traded?
Posted
Disagree. The biggest question is what we're going to get out of Shortstop. It's been our big Achilles heel for several years now and Scutaro being able to solidify the position with half decent production would be absolutely huge, disproportionate to the actual production even..
Posted
But the sox are accustomed to 0 production out of SS. Scutaro is all about the defense. Offensively, Ortiz has the potential to be an impact player, Scutaro doesn't.
Posted
That's why Scutaro has the potential to be bigger than life. Because the Sox are used to not getting much there, and he can improve on that. While Ortiz falling apart entirely would leave the Sox scrambling for a replacement, a replacement DH is not all that difficult to find and we could possibly limp along with Lowell in that role.
Posted
Ortiz is a part of it, but the offense after Youkilis is the biggest questionmark IMO. Drew is the only guy whose offensive production you can bank on, yet his injury problems and chronic shoulder/back issues make his contribution questionable. If the new acquisitions and Papi get their s*** straight and play well, then this team is gonna be very, very good.
Posted
that's not what he said. He said Youks is the only guy whose production the Sox can bank on, and that if Drew, Ortiz, VMart, et. al. play up to their ability the Sox are going to be very good. Not a lot to disagree with.
Posted
What I meant was the positions after Youkilis. I think the sox top 4 is gonna be solid from Ells-Pedroia-VMart-Youkilis. You can bank on those guys hitting around or near their standards set over the past couple seasons. From the #5 spot on, the questions arise with every single hitter
Posted
Drew is the only guy whose offensive production you can bank on, yet his injury problems and chronic shoulder/back issues make his contribution questionable

 

I guess I just see this statement as a contradiction. Shouldn't "bank on" mean that he's consistently productive? Not injury prone and questionable?

Posted
Sorry yz, what I mean was that after Youkilis, he's the only guy who you're pretty sure what his OPS is gonna be. Its gonna be around .900. The question is, will that be over 100 games or over 140?
Posted
Sorry yz' date=' what I mean was that after Youkilis, he's the only guy who you're pretty sure what his OPS is gonna be. Its gonna be around .900. The question is, will that be over 100 games or over 140?[/quote']

 

Fair enough, but I still think Ortiz's consistent production over 162 games (maybe) is a bigger question mark than if we can get an extra 40 out of Drew.

Posted
Run Production will be the biggest issue. Secondarily, can Dice K and Buchholz become solid and dependable starters. At least one needs to answer the bell. If neither gives a solid performance, they will have problems.
Posted

Agree that it's Ortiz with Dice-K a close second.

 

Although... if you had told me during his HR drought last year that he would finish with 28 HR and 99 RBI, I would not have believed it for a second. Lets just assume this year he doesn't go 35-40 games or whatever it was before he hit his first homer. If he's a little more consistent I think he could still hit somewhere around 30-35 home runs this year. That would not shock me much.

 

The OBP however, has fallen off a cliff the past 2 years. Lets hope he can right the ship there and at least bump it up a little bit from '09.

Posted
Agree that it's Ortiz with Dice-K a close second.

 

Although... if you had told me during his HR drought last year that he would finish with 28 HR and 99 RBI, I would not have believed it for a second.

I did and you didn't.:D
Posted
I did and you didn't.:D

 

Somehow I don't remember this. Maybe it's because I was too busy banging my head into a wall after every April/mid May David Ortiz strikeout/weak groundout.

Posted
Somehow I don't remember this. Maybe it's because I was too busy banging my head into a wall after every April/mid May David Ortiz strikeout/weak groundout.
You weren't the only one banging your head.
Posted

I agree with Coco. The two biggest for me are Ortiz and Dice-K. As we saw last season, we can't win those close games with a guaranteed out in the 3-spot. He needs to at least have a 2007ish year. Hell, I'd take a year like late 2009 at this point.

 

But Dice-K is the biggest one for me. He has never shown consistency. We can't win on a regular basis with only a top 3 in the rotation and nothing else. Dice needs to solidify the rotation in order for them to be a real threat in the division, and that means pitching more than 5 innings and giving up less than 100 walks an inning.

Posted
I think the biggest concerns are Ortiz and the 5 SP health(Which IMO is a concern every season). The Sox have a very talented group, but we all know it's rare for a team to go wire to wire with the same starting 5.
Posted

You guys already got the big questions out. I think offense overall is the big question mark. Can they play somewhat to their potential, overcome horrible road woes of last year and compete with the Yankee line-up? Can they hit good pitching? Can they be injury free for most part? Can they overcome age issue? What happens to Lowell? Will there be black hole in line up like last year 6-9 ( at least before V-Mart came abroad)?

 

How concerned people are with:

 

1. Bullpen- we lost some poeple here.

2. Defensive shortcoming in both the catcher's positions.

3. A personal big Q for me - most might disagree. Day to day game management of Tito.

Posted
We didn't really lose any people out of the pen. Correct me if I'm wrong but besides Wagner who was used in a small sample size, the only other contributor we lost was Saito, and it seemed like he never pitched in an important situation or game. Guys like Delcarmen and Rameriz need to have good full years and not falter in the 2nd half after a good start like they did last year. Bard could be a question mark too, how much will he progress in his development this year?
Posted
I'd probably say the bullpen since I don't fully trust Bard yet and both MDC and Ramon dropped off a bit in the second half. The team can win with Ortiz slumping a bit and Dice-K being somewhat ineffective but if the 'pen doesn't perform, that's a much bigger blow.
Posted

How concerned people are with:

 

1. Bullpen- we lost some poeple here.

2. Defensive shortcoming in both the catcher's positions.

3. A personal big Q for me - most might disagree. Day to day game management of Tito.

For all the focus on defense and pitching, we suck defensively at the catcher position. Neither Varitek or VMart can throw out even the slowest runners. Most singles will be the equivalent of doubles.
Posted
The pitching staff if just as guilty as the catcher tandem. Specially Wakefield (Lol knuckler) and BoSox pitchers don't pay much attention to holding runners back in general.
Posted
The pitching staff if just as guilty as the catcher tandem. Specially Wakefield (Lol knuckler) and BoSox pitchers don't pay much attention to holding runners back in general.
Turning singles into doubles is a problem. It doesn't matter who is more at fault.
Posted
Identifying the actual location of the problem is the first step towards finding a solution. If pitchers can hold runners back, it'll be much harder for them to steal bases.
Posted
Thats what I said all last year, the coaching staff is part of the problem. I don't know why Francona and Farrel don't tell this guys to hold the runners on. You don't even need a damn slide step, just vary how long you hold the ball or at least and try to look at the runner when he is on first base.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...