Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Answer to this question? Absolutely. He constructed a very old' date=' very creaky team and is having his ass handed to him for it.[/quote']For all the blather I hear on this board about how this FO is not willing to mortgage the future, you are exactly right. This is an old injured creaky bunch. Where's the speed that a young team should have? Other than Ellsbury, we have no speed. Drew, Pedroia and Bay are good base runners, but their speed is not a weapon. In 2007, this team at times had three guys in the lineup that could fly. Ellsbury, Crisp and Lugo were speed weapons. They could steal, take the extra base and leg out IF hits. Now, I'm not advocating that we should have kept Crisp or Lugo. I am just noting that speed really is not a weapon for us other than Ells, and when he is slumping, speed is not part of our game.
Posted
I didn't say he was traded for peanuts. But he could have been got. What the Sox gave up for VMart probably would have also worked for Lee.

 

I disagree, but I digress.

Posted
I disagree' date=' but I digress.[/quote']

 

Eh, I think you're disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing

 

VMart and Lee are the same age. VMart plays every day and is the best hitting catcher in the AL after Mauer. Lee just came off his best season and is having another good one, but he has been inconsistent in the past.

 

How exactly does Lee merit more prospects than VMart?

Posted
Eh, I think you're disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing

 

VMart and Lee are the same age. VMart plays every day and is the best hitting catcher in the AL after Mauer. Lee just came off his best season and is having another good one, but he has been inconsistent in the past.

 

How exactly does Lee merit more prospects than VMart?

 

Lee slipped between Theo's fingers because he was so fixated on Halladay, apparently.

Posted
Lee slipped between Theo's fingers because he was so fixated on Halladay' date=' apparently.[/quote']

 

I really doubt that. if a GM can't multitask he has no business doing the job. The price Philly gave up to get Lee was not a small one. This may have been a simple situation where Theo set a price and wouldn't go beyond it, and the Phils went beyond it.

Posted
I really doubt that. if a GM can't multitask he has no business doing the job. The price Philly gave up to get Lee was not a small one. This may have been a simple situation where Theo set a price and wouldn't go beyond it' date=' and the Phils went beyond it.[/quote']

 

Thank you, Mr. Epstein.

Posted
Lee slipped between Theo's fingers because he was so fixated on Halladay' date=' apparently.[/quote']

 

If that's the case he absolutely needs to take a hit here.

Posted
I didn't say he was traded for peanuts. But he could have been got. What the Sox gave up for VMart probably would have also worked for Lee.

 

I read that the Guardians would not do both to one team. Theo got a good deal for VMart, but his priority was wrong. He should have gotten Lee.But I doubt he could have gotten Lee for the same package as for VMart. He had the Phillies seriously competing for Lee, and it probably would have cost him Buchholz.

 

What I found disturbing is Theo makes a good deal for LaRoche, who comes in and hits well the first few games. The he deals for VMart and promptly trades LaRoche for Kotchman.That tells me Theo didn't have his head together about what he really wanted to do at the trade deadline. Sure, things can change depending on who suddenly becomes available, but to trade a guy you just traded for to fill a hole--that tells me things were a bit too fluid.

 

You go back to 2007, and the Beckett/Lowell deal that gave them the Championship. Theo didn't make that deal--he was off somewhere pouting at the time about press leaks. Some say he doesn't make the deal if he's there. He wouldn't have given up Hanley R., who was in single or double A ball. If there was no championship in 2007, Epstein's record would look different now.

 

Not that I think he's a bad GM. He's done some great things--and some bad things. He has a lot of money to spend, and tends to be overrated. But there are far worse GMs out there.

Posted
Not that I think he's a bad GM. He's done some great things--and some bad things. He has a lot of money to spend' date=' and tends to be overrated. But there are far worse GMs out there.[/quote']Right now the scale is tipping in the wrong direction for Epstein.
Posted
Right now the scale is tipping in the wrong direction for Epstein.

 

You say that, but you watch how quickly other teams come running to grab him if the Red Sox are stupid enough to let him go or dismiss his effectiveness.

Posted
Just because other teams will do something doesnt make it a right move. That being said, Epstein should have a lot longer leash than some are proposing and I guarantee he will stay in his position for a long, long time. Because not only is he keeping the team competitive and filling the park, he is doing so at less and less a salary burden, which makes the ownership really, really happy.
Posted

The interesting thing is we don't really know how the strings are pulled on the Red Sox. Who is responsible for what. Who built the farm system? Who picks the draft selections? Who hires the staff?

My guess is there are others involved besides Epstein for most decisions. It just isn't public knowledge.

Posted
You say that' date=' but you watch how quickly other teams come running to grab him if the Red Sox are stupid enough to let him go or dismiss his effectiveness.[/quote']That really doesn't mean a thing. FO incompetents have been getting shuffled around major league organizations for as long as the game has been around. I'm not saying that Theo is an incompetent, but this season is not one of his finer moments.
Posted
I disagree' date=' but I digress.[/quote']

 

The interesting thing is we don't really know how the strings are pulled on the Red Sox. Who is responsible for what. Who built the farm system? Who picks the draft selections? Who hires the staff?

My guess is there are others involved besides Epstein for most decisions. It just isn't public knowledge.

 

Epstein is responsible regardless of who does the scouting and player evaluations. He has done a good job in amateur player acquisition and development.

 

Similarly, he is responsible for ML player acquisitions and contracts. In my opinion, he has done a poor job overall in this function, despite some obvious winners.

Posted
f*** off Jacko, patronizing motherless f***, give him a chance....Kidding

Its hard coming in here and wanting to discuss things that have been analyzed by the panel ad nauseum.

It wasnt a bad idea bringing in Smoltz and Penny but it emphasizes the huge discrepency in talent between the National League and American...I heard a guy on espn say that St Louis has the best 3 man rotation in their league and that maybe true. Whats also true is that of the 3 men 2 were waived by AL teams including Joelle Piniero, a guy who couldnt get anyone out in the AL and now is very effective in the NL...Penny and Smoltz could probably still be effective if they didnt have to see the DH and the deeper teams we have in the AL, they are simply useless here,especially Smoltz.

 

 

I don't think there is any scenario where Smoltz could still "be effective"........except throwing out the "meatballs" for the Home Run derby........;)

Posted

When did Theo last make a good trade or free agent sign? As much credit he gets for homegrown player development ( should he?) - he has totally sucked as a GM.

 

2006 - Red Sox season failed becuase they did not get Abreau and Lidle from the Phillies - and let the Yankees get them. Theo then said "We are not the Yankees". Next off-season he signed Lugo and Drew to ridiculous contracts.

 

From WMP to Gagne - he has done one mistake after another but still gets a free pass from the Sox fans. He has failed the Sox multiple times and lost to the Yankees from Damon to Texiera. When he has won ( Matsuzaka) - his move did not pan out. The only trade that has benifited the Sox since 2004 is Becket + Lowell and I think if Theo was in charge - we do not make that trade.

 

Get rid of Theo now and throw out Tito as well. We need to do complete rebuild.

Posted
When did Theo last make a good trade or free agent sign? As much credit he gets for homegrown player development ( should he?) - he has totally sucked as a GM.

 

2006 - Red Sox season failed becuase they did not get Abreau and Lidle from the Phillies - and let the Yankees get them. Theo then said "We are not the Yankees". Next off-season he signed Lugo and Drew to ridiculous contracts.

 

From WMP to Gagne - he has done one mistake after another but still gets a free pass from the Sox fans. He has failed the Sox multiple times and lost to the Yankees from Damon to Texiera. When he has won ( Matsuzaka) - his move did not pan out. The only trade that has benifited the Sox since 2004 is Becket + Lowell and I think if Theo was in charge - we do not make that trade.

 

Get rid of Theo now and throw out Tito as well. We need to do complete rebuild.

 

He should.

 

But he has sucked ass in the FA market.

Posted
To be honest with you, the scouting director is the one who coordinates all of the draftees and the scouting. So while Theo might get some credit for it, he isnt the one putting in the time. For the yankees, their drafts and latin signings are run by Damon Oppenheimer. Cashman gets involved if he truly wants a player OR if there is a change in budget. I think the biggest thing Theo gets credit for is recognizing the talent that the scouting director drafts and not dealing them away in stupid deals.
Posted
Epstein is responsible regardless of who does the scouting and player evaluations. He has done a good job in amateur player acquisition and development.

 

Similarly, he is responsible for ML player acquisitions and contracts. In my opinion, he has done a poor job overall in this function, despite some obvious winners.

 

You know, you never see these responsibilites spelled out in the media. It would be good if the fans knew just who is responsible for doing what. I recall reading during the ARod non-deal a couple of years ago that big money decisions were made by a Committee of 4:

Epstein, Lucchino, Werner? and Henry. Don't know if that's changed or how that affects trades or FA signings.

 

Epstein & Co. certainly have done an excellent job in player development. I agree FA signings and trades have been poor too often. But the recent Bay. LaRoche and VMart trades have been strong--though I think he missed on his priorities (i.e., a starting pitcher).

And VMart's offensive impact would be much stronger if he would replace Ortiz in the lineup.

 

I get the impression Epstein is torn between developing home grown players and signing or trading for proven veterans. There is an obvious money benefit in developing your own.The problem is only a few pan out, and the rest lose their value quickly if they don't.

I would argue it is less risky to trade an unproven talent for a proven one--if you can afford to take on salary.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
It may be less risky in terms of success rate, but your misses can be pretty strong if one does pan out. Look at the Beckett trade. He's been great in some stretches over the time the Sox have had him, and the throw-in, Lowell has provided good to great play at 3B (until this recent stretch). However, Hanley Ramirez has been an MVP caliber player for the entire duration of his time in FLA. They got something good in that deal, but they paid dearly for it.
Posted

 

Get rid of Theo now and throw out Tito as well. We need to do complete rebuild.

 

I think Tito's job is less secure than Theo's. Though Tito is a popular guy. But his 1 inning per relief pitcher regimen has worn the bullpen thin. The Yankees used a guy for 3 innings in the extra-inning game the other night while Tito was shuffling pitchers every inning, and had nobody left in the end but Tazawa. That was followed up by bringing a no-name from the minors to come into a 2-0 game yesterday. And then there's Youks playing LF--not easy in Yankee Stadium. Where is Reddick? And the persistence in keeping Ortiz in a lineup that isn't hitting. I see a lot of disarray there, right now. The club is sinking fast partly because of bad decisions.

Posted
When did Theo last make a good trade or free agent sign? As much credit he gets for homegrown player development ( should he?) - he has totally sucked as a GM.

 

2006 - Red Sox season failed becuase they did not get Abreau and Lidle from the Phillies - and let the Yankees get them. Theo then said "We are not the Yankees". Next off-season he signed Lugo and Drew to ridiculous contracts.

 

From WMP to Gagne - he has done one mistake after another but still gets a free pass from the Sox fans. He has failed the Sox multiple times and lost to the Yankees from Damon to Texiera. When he has won ( Matsuzaka) - his move did not pan out. The only trade that has benifited the Sox since 2004 is Becket + Lowell and I think if Theo was in charge - we do not make that trade.

 

Get rid of Theo now and throw out Tito as well. We need to do complete rebuild.

 

Trade: Last week, for Martinez. Crisp for Ramon Ramirez was pretty good.

FA signing: Okajima was probably his best in the last three, four years.

 

I'd bet you want Lou Piniella as manager.

Posted
I think Tito's job is less secure than Theo's. Though Tito is a popular guy. But his 1 inning per relief pitcher regimen has worn the bullpen thin. The Yankees used a guy for 3 innings in the extra-inning game the other night while Tito was shuffling pitchers every inning' date=' and had nobody left in the end but Tazawa. That was followed up by bringing a no-name from the minors to come into a 2-0 game yesterday. And then there's Youks playing LF--not easy in Yankee Stadium. [b']Where is Reddick?[/b] And the persistence in keeping Ortiz in a lineup that isn't hitting. I see a lot of disarray there, right now. The club is sinking fast partly because of bad decisions.

 

Green, Papi, Reddick, Kotch/Lowell on the same lineup? :o

 

Yes please.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund
The Talk Sox Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Red Sox community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...