A Destitute Man’s replacement. Gordon had a 4 year stretch where he was worth 21.6 fWAR. In 5 full seasons, Benintendi has been worth less than half of that…
Even the Rays opened up for star talent once in a while. They signed Longoria to a 6 year $100mill contract back in 2016. Adjusting for inflation and converting Ray Bucks to USD, that deal would be equivalent to a 6 year $45,000,000,000,000 today…
It doesn’t appear to make sense, but that’s because we only use comparative methods of evaluating it.
Let’s say the Sox farm had 100 future fWAR in it. And that total was good for the 20th best future fWAR from any farm. Then after the draft and a couple trades (and some player development), the Sox are able to add 15 more fWAR. But then after the draft and the trade deadline last year, so are the 19 teams in front of Boston. So now it’s still 20th. But did the farm improve?
True, but other than Betts, the Sox haven’t done much selling off of veterans for prospects lately. At least not veterans anyone cared about. (Sorry, Mr. Hembree.)
I never said anything about whether or not the evaluators were including Whitlock. I just said he was never part of the Red Sox farm. And to date, he hasn’t been…
MLB Properties appears to be run similar to many other private corporate giants. For example, Cargill has a board of directors largely comprised of the Cargill and MacMillan families, who appoint a CEO (in this case, David MacLennon) to run the company. The MLB owners largely act like the BOD family members, and Manfred is the MLB doppelgänger for MacLennon…
Yes, if you keep trading your MLB starters to bulk it up. Maybe there’s a reason Baltimore, Detroit and Miami are among the league’s best farm on just about every ranking…
Exactly, and just like in MLB, Dairy Queen franchise owners can’t sell the company property for private gain i.e. owning a DQ franchise doesn’t give someone the legal right to make Dairy Queen tee shirts and sell them on Etsy.
(Dairy Queen probably wouldn’t waste their time pursuing legal action in this case, but they would certainly be able to.)
I don’t think it’s the anti trust exemption that denies the owners the ability to market their brands. It’s because the teams and their logos are property of MLB, not Henry, Steinbrenner and company
It’s also not true to call the owners “individual business owners.” MLB is a singular business, not a group of businesses. The “owners” are really just majority shareholders in different divisions of the same company. They don’t really own anything, and are not free to license their brand individually…