Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    52,073
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. You mean people simply not convinced of anything by his whopping 87 plate appearances? Or by his 170 plate appearances over two years? By the way, when counting the pollyannas who called him unlucky, do you count StatCast among them?
  2. Tolerable to good in the minors? Check. Willing to pitch for no money? Check
  3. BB before Masa bomb? You do not credit him enough, sir…
  4. Brewer has been horrific this year. He’s lucky the Cubs placed him on IL over simply releasing him..
  5. At least on that one you did say something to that effect. “Sale is getting a fresh start with a new good team, and I just think he will end up having a good year. If you don’t like I’m hoping, and predicting that Sale with have a healthy, and good 2024, which obviously you don’t then TDB.” Of course I will have to deduct points because once again you went and made up something that I’ve never said. I’ve made zero predictions about Sale this year, and only that I understood why they got frustrated with his last 4 years. Probably should deduct more points for bring happy the Sox dealt a player you thought would be good. But I suppose no one expects you to actually be consistent and logical…
  6. Both are possible, but until we get any confirmation from Jansen himself, neither can be correct. As for me, I wouldn’t have minded seeing Jansen receive the honor, and I agree Clay Holmes going means either the selection committee is clueless or made up of Clay Holmes’ parents. Or both. But I am at least glad Jansen (and the rest of his bullpen cronies) get a couple of well-deserved days off, because they will be needed in the second half…
  7. Post 333 mentions nothing of the sort and was a result of an argument between you and Hugh. If you’re going to be that guy who likes calling other peoples suggestions wrong, you really need to be more accurate about your own stuff. Still think I was wrong for wanting Houck and Crawford extended?
  8. From a guy who said he didn’t mind seeing Sale go but thought the Sox overpaid to have him gone. Now see there nothing wrong with that particular criticism. But now you keep fabricating this “prediction” that it was easy to see Sale bouncing back. Just like you kept fabricating s*** I said just so you could taunt me…
  9. And maybe now the Sox need to extend Houck and Crawford…
  10. In a rare moment, I agree here…
  11. Or for most of 2019. That’s why this bounce back has only been predicted by pessimists and liars…
  12. He did a lot of damage this weekend. But that last home run came when being pitched around…
  13. He also has a $20mill option that vests with another 76 IP…
  14. An injury risk for only 2 months is probably worth it. It’s not like they need to extend him to a 3 or 4 year deal here…
  15. Actually the “Williams Shift” predates Ted Williams’ career. It was first employed against Cubs/Phillies left-handed slugger Frederick “Cy” Williams, whose career went from 1912-1930…
  16. Definitely a solid add…
  17. The Rockies DFAd Dakota Hudson today. Hudson is surprisingly not injured, but rather just having a horrible year, highlighted by his 48:46 K:BB ratio and 5.84 ERA. But the one thing that intrigues me about Hudson is he’s never been a particularly hard thrower, and rather gotten by with his breaking stuff. Could this be a formula Bailey can tap into for some success? Also intriguing - his ERA away from Coors - 3.72….
  18. Of course Sale wouldn’t get injured by Angry Birds. That’s more of a David Price thing…
  19. Every time you type that, I picture you as the cranky, grizzled, flannel-wearing greybeard forcibly squeezing monosyllabic grunts to express your frustration with those gosh darn changes in the world. It’s very Neanderthal. It brings a smile to my face every time
  20. Like I have been saying about Sale for years - his issue isn’t talent…
  21. So Bellhorn, do you limit your critiques solely to my posts? We gotta live one here…
  22. I think the rule changes do help. Pitch clock can occasionally tell the runner an idea when the windup can start, giving him an extra step or two before the pitcher even starts. The rule minimizing pickoff attempts helps, too. Once the pitcher has thrown over twice, that runner can go take a much, much larger lead…
  23. Yes I do know what he meant. He was specific about how the Sox would be better if Duran/Hamilton/Wong hit fewer extra base hits and instead just got to first base and used their speed to get into the pitchers’ heads. While I get the importance of the runner on first causing problems for the pitcher, how is that more important than the overall vast improvements we have seen in those small speedy guys he says have no business hitting “one run home runs”? (And how did you possibly not attack that?) Duran is one of the best offensive players in the league. Wong leads all AL catchers in batting average (150 PA min). These are players using the metrics and their lessons to become significant offensive contributors and potential All Stars. But Jung is suggesting they dial it back and instead one third of the lineup fall back into a role where their job is to instead support the remaining hitters.
  24. Right. Good call. Duran needs to change his approach and stop being a top ten player in the AL. Ditto Wong with his batting average among league best…
×
×
  • Create New...