Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

notin

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    51,945
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by notin

  1. It’s weird how many people think Henry doesn’t mind paying taxes as long as the baseball team is good. Sure he’s making more money, which he needs to do to pay off those taxes. But then rich people like paying taxes. That’s why the Republican Party went extinct. Oh wait...
  2. So. ... no Eovaldi either? His injury history is comparable and the financial risk will be far worse...
  3. Do we really need him there either?
  4. Yeah!!! Let’s take the best defensive outfielder in baseball and move him back to a position he hasn’t played in4 years so we can also put JDM in the outfield!!! We can weaken ourselves at 2 positions defensively at once!! Also who’s the new DH?
  5. So until he gets an actual offer, then he should be on the radar? And he doesn’t have one yet. Should the Red Sox also avoid Eovaldi because some team might offer him 5 years? Maybe Pearce should have been off the radar because Jacko speculated he’d get multi year offers and start 150 games. (For the record, he never got those offers.) The Buchholz-Paranoia s crazy with some people. Every year the reasons get less and less rational as to why a minor league deal is a bad idea. Make him an offer and if he gets a better one, he goes elsewhere. Really not a big deal...
  6. Holding on to Chavis is counterintuitive to being “all in”. Besides, how many third basemen will we need in 2021?
  7. If durability is so important to the point where a minor league deal is a bad idea, please explain to me again why fans are obsessed with guaranteeing $60mill for a pitcher who has had TJ surgery twice and threw only 111 IP last year and only 235 IP in the last 3 years? I’m not saying the Sox shouldn’t sign Eovaldi. I’m saying if you think durability is the real reason not to give Buchholz a minor league deal, then you’re a hypocrite if you also advocate signing Eovaldi...
  8. I do agree Chavis is trade bait
  9. I hope it’s Swihart. But some teams might prefer Vazquez. Btw, any deal for an MLB pitcher puts Johnson’s roster spot at risk. Might as well include him too...
  10. Not really true. There may be an actual desire to limit the amount paid, which would limit the exact types of contracts you say are a non-issue...
  11. I see a situation where a catcher is dealt for a reliever or prospect...
  12. So by your calculations, it looks like bringing back Pearce might have prevented the return of Kelly/replacement set up guy. This does assume the team is limited by luxury tax thresholds. By even simpler math, it means goodbye to Blake Swihart (or another catcher)...
  13. Was it yesterday or, you know, 3 years ago when the option was an issue?
  14. We’re talking about Clay Buchholz here. He isn’t going to make 20 starts...
  15. 1) His numbers probably won’t be as good in the AL, they were in Chris Sale territory. But that is not the same as saying they will be bad. 2) Speculation. Plus the goal is for depth. 3) The pitchers you name aren’t 20-somethings on the rise . Might as well give Buchhioz the opportunity to develop. Wright was born the same month as Buchholz. (Buchholz is 16 days older than Wright.) But being real about it, there will be plenty of opportunities for everyone. Last year, the Sox has 7 pitchers who made double digit starts and 9 pitchers who started 4 or more games. And that was an uncharacteristically healthy year. 4) Suggesting a minor league deal. Keep up. No one is suggesting signing him for $13mill. 5)Point? Actually it is entirely possible that Kelly might be off the table with the signing of Steve Pearce. Unless Henry unleashes the payroll beyond all luxury tax tiers...
  16. H Even Pearce fears The Cliff...
  17. For the record, Buchholz did not make $13.5mill last year. He did make that much in 2017 in Philadelphia as part of the final option year of his contract originally signed in Boston. But last year he joined Arizona on a minor league deal. And as he was injured, might be willing (or have no choice but) to settle for another...
  18. If you prefer Brian Johnson over Buchholz, then you are prioritizing pace of play over winning...
  19. His history with injuries is enough that GMs will avoid guaranteed money. And last year clinched that
  20. Dunno. That’s a question for DD. It’s possible the $60mill/4year guesses (for Eovaldi) were way off base...
  21. He didn’t get an Major League deal last year. He’s older now with one more injury in his history. Sign him DD!! Just to a minor league deal!!
  22. Buchholz would be an excellent minor league depth signing, like he was last year for Arizona. He just shouldn’t be counted on for a full season. But for short stretches, he’s a good solution, better than Johnson or Velasquez...
  23. I’ve been saying this amount (but not years) for 3 weeks. It’s the market price...
  24. Good thing signing Pearce. I was hoping signing Eovaldi/Kimbrel/whoever wouldn’t prevent it...
  25. I think you massively overestimate the earning potential of 35yo career bench players...
×
×
  • Create New...