Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

illinoisredsox

Verified Member
  • Posts

    7,879
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by illinoisredsox

  1. The A's used to be the Yankees major league farm team. If NY had a kid they wanted to get some seasoning, they would trade him to the KC Athletics for a veteran who could help NY out now. After a couple of years, if the kid proved himself, he would be traded back to the Yanks for either another kid or a spare part.
  2. He hasn't stunk, but more like decidedly mediocre. Runs allowed: 1 2 times 2 2 times 3 7 times 4 5 times 5+ 6 times He should have around a .500 record with those types of numbers (or rather the Sox should be around .500 in those games, they are 8-14 in Porcello starts).. You give up 5+ runs you are going to lose most of the time and 4 runs you should split at best. Games you give up 3 or less you should win a decent percentage. Yet the Sox are 3-8 in games where he has allowed 3 or less runs. And one can disparage run support all they want, the Sox have been shut out 5 times in Porcello starts, meaning 0% chance of winning no matter how well he pitched. They have scored 2 runs or less 12 times n his 22 starts. OTOH, it hasn't been a total famine; they have scored 5 or more runs 9 times in games he's pitched, so it just seems like they never score for him.
  3. They don't ask how, they ask how many. As in how many outs did you get and how many runs did you allow. That "junk" has a 12-4 record with an ERA around 3.00; he's been doing something right this year.
  4. I hope you are correct.
  5. OTOH, when they write crap like this, I'm not sure I blame the players: http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/columnists/2017/07/borges_let_the_boos_rain_down_on_phony_david_price_tonight?utm_campaign=bostonherald_trending_stories&utm_source=bostonherald&utm_medium=trending_stories Yes, Eck was wronged. There is no defending what Price did. But if it was such a big story, why did it take a month to surface? And who is feeding the flames now? Both sides need to grow up. BTW, I loved the comment after article citing Borges being fired from the Globe for plagiarism a decade ago. (Edit - comment appears to have been removed. Too bad, it was a link to an article about the firing).
  6. Ugh; not a good pitching match-up. Vargas, who was at least in the conversation for the start in the all-star game, against Porcello, for whom the Sox seemingly last scored a run some time in May.
  7. Exactly. The media is gone. He attacked 2-3 of their own. He could put up Pedro numbers and they will still be on him. When it comes to criticism, the only thing more thinskinned than the players is the media.
  8. Much as we want to rag on Price, his loss, if for an extended period of time, is a big one. Expecting Johnson to fill that spot is not realistic.
  9. That was to get Nunez on the 40 man. The Marrero move was to get him on the 25 man roster.
  10. He's listed as an infielder on MLB,com, ESPN just lists him as "minors" though they have his position as RF. I guess there a couple guys who could be listed either way, Holt being the other obvious one.
  11. Agree. I don't see every game, but it seems to me when Eck's in the booth, any conversation about himself or his career centers around some mistake he made (a "bomb" he gave up or some time when he made a boneheaded play like forgetting to cover first; as I recall, his words on that were "we've all done it"). "Yuck" may not have been the most artful of adjectives to use, but would "ugh" have made things any better? He's not Vin Scully. Eck says it like he sees it without a whole lot of bias. If a Sox player makes a great play, he says it. If an opposing player makes a great play, he says it. Ditto the bad plays. Problem is, the feedback on the former somehow never gets back to players; they only hear the negative.
  12. First they will have to put him back on the 40 man roster. Not saying they won't, but to bring him up, they will have to clear a spot via release or trade. Right now, the Sox list only 5 oufielders on the 40 man (per MLB.com) and that includes Holt. There are no minor league OFs at all on it.
  13. This is where NL teams have an advantage. Their bench players actually get to the plate a few times a week when they are called on to hit for the pitchers. Throw in double switches and they get some actual game time. AL bench types (other than the back-up catcher) can go a week or more without doing more than spitting sunflower seeds.
  14. I agree that the hand may have something to do with it, but even early on it seemed to me he was getting a lot of soft hits. IMO, his penchant for taking at least one strike and sometimes 2 has caught up to him. He does adjust and take a more defensive swing with 2 strikes, but he was flaring a lot of pitcher's pitches into the short outfield. You can't get away with that for very long.
  15. It's not just last year. Bogaerts' career slash line: 1st Half - .293/.350/.771 2nd Half - .274/.320/.719 Breaking it down further: Apr - .289/.368/.748 May - .342/.392/.905 Jun - .265/.306/.702 July - .273/.313/.694 Aug - .240/.291/.604 Sep - .291/.345/.802 For a guy from the tropics, he sure cools down when the weather gets hot. Do we have our own version of Mr. May?
  16. Fair enough. I don't see how one newly acquired player is going to make a difference in the offense without 3 or 4 of the current players raising their game.
  17. Kimbrel? He faced 2 batters and struck both out. Boyer pitched the 8th and started the 9th; got the first guy then gave up a hit and a wallk. That brought in Kimbrel.
  18. No offense but I wasn't asking you. I figured a700 wouldn't bother to respond; I was right.
  19. So what would your line-up be then?
  20. Hard to believe, but allowing 2 runs in 2 2/3 innings last night actually lowered his ERA from 7.54 to 7.46.
  21. Bogaerts' ABs are becoming so predictable. Take 2 strikes (one of them very hittable) and then flail at a slider.
  22. Price in the clubhouse will have nothing to do on whether they get past the first round or even get to the first round. If people think getting rid of him and replacing him in the rotation with Fister or Johnson is going to change this team for the better, they are nuts. If Betts, Bogaerts and Hanley don't start hitting like they are capable of, it's not going to matter. Beni and Bradley getting a little more consistent would help as well.
  23. Well that's true. But he is going on both Tuesday at the latest. So long as he remains on the active 25 roster (or DL), no option year is burned. Unless he completely flops, he will stay there the rest of the year. Come to think of it, even if he does get off to a very rough start, I doubt they send him down.
×
×
  • Create New...