Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

illinoisredsox

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,211

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by illinoisredsox

  1. illinoisredsox
    This is not that difficult: 1) His current contract contains the vesting option that kicks in if he gets those 1050 Plate Appearances over the 2017 and 2018 season. As of today, he has 748. 2) If another team claims him off waivers or makes a trade for him, they assume the terms of his current contract. This makes it extremely unlikely that any club will take him in this manner. 3) Once released (in a week), he is free to sign a new contract with any team. Any plate appearances from here forward will be under that new contract, not his current Red Sox one. He got 748 PAs under his current contract; that is not 1050 and the option does not vest.
  2. illinoisredsox
    That's the way I understand it. But either way, it's still a new contract, so any PAs he has from here forward are under the new contract. For the option to have kicked in, he needed 1050 PAs during the 2017-18 seasons. He got 748. It doesn't vest.
  3. illinoisredsox
    If somebody trades for him, then they pick up all the terms of the contract (I would imaging any trade would include a large cash payment from Boston to the new team to pay the salary). Why would a team even part with a Grade B prospect and be on the hook for the option if they can just sign him in a week as a free agent for 2/3 of the major league minimum.
  4. illinoisredsox
    He'll be released from his contract in a week. Signing with another team is a new contract. He can't go play for another team unless he is under contract to them somehow. That agreement with the new team would almost certainly be for the major league minimum, and that would be prorated for the 2/3 of the season remaining.
  5. illinoisredsox
    Well, don't feel TOO sorry for him; by the end of the year, he'll have been paid nearly $160 mil for his career.
  6. illinoisredsox
    No. If he is picked up off of waivers or via trade, the new team picks up all the terms of the contract, including the vesting clauses (which is why he won't be). If he signs with a new team, it is a new contract. The Red Sox must honor the terms of his Red Sox contract (i.e., they have to pay him the balance of this year's salary). But those terms require 497 PAs for the option to vest, which he didn't and won't get under his Red Sox contract. Any PAs from here forward would be under his new contract; they are not additive.
  7. illinoisredsox
    The option only is in play if Hanley is traded/claimed off waivers (which is about as likely as 59 year old me signing with a team). If he does get picked up after that, it becomes a new contract and the option is void. The new team would pay the prorated portion of the minimum (~$367K) with the Sox on the hook for the balance of this year's contract (roughly $12.5M). For $367K, somebody will take a shot.
  8. illinoisredsox
    I would think this means that Swihart will see some action at first, at least against tough lefties. Moreland is best if he doesn't play every day (maybe he plays 4-5x a week with Swihart 2x).
  9. illinoisredsox
    One problem; if a player is sent down, he has to stay there 10 days (unless a player with the big league club is placed on the DL).
  10. illinoisredsox
    It's mostly 2 people, and IMO all they are showing is we have a couple of the dumbest posters in existence.
  11. illinoisredsox
    Here's another article on the robo-ump subject: https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/37347/robo-strike-zone-not-simple-think/
  12. illinoisredsox
    ' Do we really? This article seems to indicate it's not as good as one might think. It has some extensive and interesting insights from the Director of Technology for Baseball Prospectus on the subject. http://www.sportingnews.com/mlb/news/robot-umpires-electronic-strike-zone-in-mlb-pitchfx-balls-and-strikes/ggv80p4qmsu31d72sohrmbcnj Note - it also quotes Joe West, but he can be ignored.
  13. illinoisredsox
    Bradley gets more borderline pitches called for strikes than anyone I've seen.
  14. illinoisredsox
    If ther Sox take the lead here, I'd let Kelly close his own game. He didn't throw too many pitches.
  15. illinoisredsox
    Interesting choice in Kelly; who closes should the Sox take the lead? Not sure I trust Hembree to do it.
  16. illinoisredsox
    Alvarado was downright nasty tonight. That two seamer was fast and had good movement. Glad to see him done.
  17. illinoisredsox
    Message from Price to Sucre about deking Nunez.
  18. illinoisredsox
    Source? It may be true, but it seems like a dumb thing to say 2 days ahead of time.
  19. illinoisredsox
    And so it starts for today.
  20. illinoisredsox
    Actually, it's not. You just put them on ignore and you don't even have to scroll past the drivel. The negative is you have to log in to have it work; if you just read, it's all there. I don't like to put people on ignore, but I like even less having to scroll past a dozen or more posts of garbage to get to a post containing something worth discussing/reading, and then having to go through another 10 of garbage again. The ignores have earned their place on the list.
  21. illinoisredsox
    Would that be a bad thing?
  22. illinoisredsox
    There's really just one critic; he's just very, ahem, passionate(?).
  23. illinoisredsox
    Well, it sounds like we'll find out Friday: http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/red_sox/2018/05/red_sox_notebook_dustin_pedroia_heading_for_friday_return
  24. illinoisredsox
    C'mon moon, he's up to 2 innings now and he's the only catcher on the staff without a passed ball. He's obviously better than everyone else. Didn't you hear, he's the next Fisk. To be fair, the yips were apparently in 2017 ST (I did a quick search for that) and he seemingly has gotten past those now.
  25. illinoisredsox
    This is one of your dumber posts, and that boggles the mind.
×
×
  • Create New...