Do you guys think that giving an absurd amount of money to a guy for an absurd amount of years is worth it? It seems like for whatever reason, this never works out.. Sure you might get a few good years, but the end of these contracts is killer. Or in some cases, the whole contract is a killer (Ellsbury, Pujols, Crawford, Vernon Wells).
Newest guy who got a huge deal is Jason Heyward (8 years $184 million) in year 1 of the deal, he is hitting .226, with no power (1 home run, .293 slg% and .617 OPS). This just reminds me of the other colossal deals that have failed. I am a big fan of the J-Hey kid and think he has to improve some, and to be fair, he is still an outstanding outfielder.
But this begs the questions, are you for or against these lucrative long term deals. if you had the chance to sign, say Mike Trout for 10 years 320 million, would you?
I am really starting to think its better/smarter to build within and make small level free agent signings, like Napoli/Koji level signings.. or low risk high reward signings (Ortiz/Andrew Miller). these deals just KILL you. We had to give up one of the best 1B in baseball just to get rid of the cancerous contract of Carl Crawford.. Hopefully David Price doesn't make this another name in the list of failed long term deals.