The team is now 6-1 in Criswell starts. His ERA remains below 3.00, despite some metrics saying he may be getting lucky.
The run support and better pen, when he starts has been lucky, but this guy is getting the job done.
Our staff has a 33% GS rate, which is below the 39% league average, but I'm pretty sure we have more nearmisses than almost anyone else. Some say the 3ER in 6IP choice of stats is flawed, and it does seem like a 4.50 ERA is not "quality,"but I feel like going 5 IP allowing 2 ERs is more "quality," especially these days. Hell, 4 IP w 1 ER allowed is better, too. Using this as a criteria, here are the Sox staff numbers:
4 IP 0-1 ERs
5 IP 0-2 ERs
7 IP 0-3 ERS
9 IP 0-4 ERS
QS/GS Traditional/ Pitcher/ Modified QS
8/10 Houck 8/10 (add a 5.1, 1ER, subtract 6IP, 3 ER)
5/10 Crawford 8/10 (subtracting one 6IP, 3ER)
2/5 Pivetta 4/5
1/7 Bello 5/7
0/4 Whitlock 4/4
0/7 Criswell 5/7 (one game was 4 IP, 2 ER)
You may disagree with my formula, and that's fine, but it's pretty amazing that these 6 SP'ers have these many modified QSs:
34/43 or 79%!
If you count the 2 actual QS (6 IP/ 3ER) I took away, we'd be at 36/43 or 84% of our starts have been quality or good starts. Some of the remaining starts were not all that bad, too.