moonslav59

That very well might happen. I do always overproject how many we protect, and sometimes miss one they end up protecting. In a way, we already "protected" Fitts, Penrod and Guerrero by adding them to the 40 in September. I think it is a lock we protect or trade Dobbins. Fulmer is Rule 5, too and will be added to the 40. That could be it. Personally, I like Jh Garcia more than Gambrell, Sikes, Castro, Bastardo, Hickey and Liu. If we keep 3, I'm going with Jh G.

I'd like to see the Tigers go all the way... maybe vs MIL.

I realize the importance of keeping as many promising pitchers on the 40 as possible, but I'm not cutting 5 to keep Jh garcia protected: I'm cutting the worst one of the 5. (I'm assuming Gasper will already be DFA'd or traded by Rule 5 time.) I think we will trade 2 of these 3 players who are on the 40, but I assume we get a ML'er in return. 2 for 1 trades are difficult in November, but if we pull one off or trade for a non 40 prospect, that could open up a slot for Jh Garcia. Abreu E Valdez or DHam

I share your concern, but it was only 30 games at AA, and .706 is not all that bad. To me, it's more about viewing him more highly than my projected 38th to 40th guys on the 40. Now, if we plan to add 4-5 significant players to the 40, this winter, then maybe that aspect flips. I'd rather trade Wikelman, Mata, Horn or Shugart, or DFA one.

I hope he was echoing what the higher ups are saying to him, such as "Now is the time," since the "foundation is set." We clearly need at least 2-3 significant pieces to be viewed as division champ competitors. If they truly meant what they are saying, the have to find those 2-3+ guys, and I'm not talking hopefuls or guys returning from major injury time off. I'm still not buying it. We heard similar things, lats winter. When I see serious actions taking place, then I will believe. For now, I'm assuming the sham continues on.

I think we have to put all our eggs in the Campbell & Anthony baskets. Campbell is a RHB and Anthony has decent splits. Trade Abreu and DHam- both LHBs. I'd try Campbell or Mayer at 3B, move Devers to 1B, Casas to DH and payoff what you need to trade Yoshida somewhere- maybe for a pricey pitcher.

I hope they don't. No matter how much the allow Brez to spend, it will have a limit, and anything spent on non-pitchers means less to be spent on pitching. I get how Bregman would improve 3B and 1B (Devers to 1B) defense, and that would help with run prevention, but an ace would do more, and that is what each of these guys would cost- ace like money.

Chris Freakin' Frail! LOL.

I was typing on my phone. Fat fingers. tge>the.

Just sign 'em quick- like the Yoshida contra...errrRRRrrrr...........

Lot's of posturing by 3 Sox talking heads: Sam, Brez & Cora. Nothing specific on the budget, of course- just this from Sam, "I don't know where the payroll is going to land. I know we're going to be focused on win totals and getting into that postseason. You can't mess around at 83, 84 or 85 wins. That's not where you want to be. You want to win the division. Get in.... Be in a position where you're sitting in a bye position and lining up who's going to be starting Game 1 of the next series. That's where we want to be." Brez added, “We asked our fans to sacrifice a lot to be patient as we build the foundation that would enable us to meet those goals. I think we’re here. I think we’re ready to deliver.”

Brez to the Brewers in 3 years?

Bello makes $2.7M in 2025, but the Tax hit is $9.2M. I was hoping the poll had multiple choices, like A) Under $190M B) $190-200M C) 200-210M D) Close to the Tax line w/o going over. (I'd vote C but B was a close second.)

Maybe the fiercest competitor in the history of baseball. RIP Pete.

I think Jh Garcia has too much upside to risk losing him to Rule 5. If you look at the projected bottom 5 players on our opening day 40 man roster, I like him more than all of them. Not only is his ceiling higher, his floor might be, too. I really, really like Abreu. He had a heel of a first year in MLB. It's easy to focus on his platoon status and some rookie fielding blunders, but he was an overall plus defender in a difficult position to play in Fenway and elsewhere. His bats declined a bit in September, but his overall numbers were very nice. He ended up with a .781 OPS. Projected to 650 PAs: .253 21 80 (about 70 XBHs) Someone, said they heard he was being considered for GG, but I'm not thinking he's at that level, yet. That being said, I like Duran & Anthony better, so trading him makes sense, unless we trade the RHB Rafaela.

I know we need to spend more. I know JH is largely to blame for our drop in budget rankings. Pointing out other GMs made massive gains in spending, since 2021 is not making an excuse. It is just presenting facts. Now, there were times, in the past, that JH sharply increased spending, while a few others did, too, but the recent big upticks in spending by more than just the usual top 5-6 teams did factor into our drop in ranking. It's possible to blame JH for not spending like he used to or like he should, but not deny the fact that others started spending way more than ever, at the same time. Presenting facts that show this is not defending anyone. Here are just a few: In 2021, we were 3rd at $180M... NYM (8th in '21 at $167M) They are at $301M, now. PHI was 5th at $174M and is now at $236M SDP was 6th at $172M and went to $236M in 2023. A better example might be the Cards, who went from 12th at $135M to 11th at $165M in '24. No doubt, we could have cut less and stayed above them, but going up from 135 to 165 in 3 years is a 22% increase. That's not "nutty" but it did contribute to us falling in the rankings.

We'd be about 10th, if 3-4 teams hadn't raised their budget's a lot, but that is not to say that JH is not a big reason we are in the middle 10. I'd say JH is more responsible, but not 100%. According to Steve the Ump, we were 6ht in '22 at $195M. #10 was TOR at $168M. To be top 10 in 2023, JH would have had to spend $180.9M. He spent $175.7M (about $5M short.) Had JH stayed the same in '23, we'd have been 9th, but so many teams jumped their spending, by a lot. Let me add, the $15M uptick in spending from the playoff team of 2021 is largely forgotten, and that year, we dropped from 3rd to 6th. That was certainly not JH's fault. Again, I'm not defending him, at all, but other GMs have gone wild on spending.

I'm guessing $210M- maybe more at the deadline.

Generic statements usually are.

I’m not holding my breath. We could cut tge budget and still sign one major FA. We could make one big trade involving a prospect plus maybe Abreu and DHam to add another major piece, without subtracting duplicated values The ability is there. The acting on it is highly in doubt.

It will be about actions with an emphasis on the “s” for plural actions. significant actions. We don’t need to add more mediocre players or depth. We need serious upgrades at 3-4 positions. Maybe 2 major additions might be enough, but anything else will be beggi g for another missed dance.

He might already have some me idea of the road ahead, but I’m sure some major specifics have yet to be made or passed on to Brez. To me, the ability to make a bold trade is almost as important as the winter spending budget and how much can be longer term deals.

I’m not believing anything Sam says, unless he talks about budget cuts or strict limits.

Randy is 100% sure we are staying under $200. maybe I misread what you said, but you seemed to imply Sam’s statement about 2024 is also about 2025. No, you did not claim it’s a done deal. i think someone else has been talking like it is a sure bet we cut. Maybe on the game threads

I think we trade Abreu and add Anthony to the OF. This keeps the unbalance the same, except. Anthony likely hits lefties better than Abreu. i think we trade DHam and go with Grissom and Campbell at2B. That adds a righty bat. I think we bank on a healthy Story to take up the RHB slack, enough to lessen the unbalanced nature of our 13 by just enough. Ref could play some OF or DH v LHPs and should start every game vs lefties.