Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    104,527
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    129

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I get it, but we need a RHB< and there isn't much out there. Abreu sucks vs LHPs, and Anthony is poised to grab the FT RF/CF job. I get it. Campbell can play F, too. I really like Abreu, but I think we'd get a very useful piece by trading him. Teoscar makes it easier to part with Wilyer.
  2. Bregman was pretty good vs LHPs, until the last 2 years, when he has had reverse splits. Arenado would be nice, if we could dump Yoshida. I might even give Mayer & Yoshi for Arenado and a catcher with no money added.
  3. I think signing Teoscar would have meant a sure trade of Rafaela or Abreu, leaving this: LF: Teoscar (Refsnyder) CF: Duran (Anthony) RF: Anthony/Rafaela or Abreu/Anthony (Campbell) Maybe we'd get a decent RP and a back-up catcher for Abreu (or Abreu + DHam)
  4. Top remaining Free Agents (ranked by MLBTR) with my estimated cost 2. Burnes $240M/8- Mayber? 3. Bregman $200M/8- Maybe? 7. Alonso $130M/5 8. Flaherty $120M/5- maybe? 9. Santander $95M/5 14. Scott $70M/5- YES *18. Hoffman $50M/4- YES *22. Estevez $30M/3- yes *28. Pivetta $63M/3 (MLBR has $21M/1) doubtful 16. Profar $50M/3 25. Heaney $25M/2 26. H Kim $25M/3 31. Quintana $22M/2 33. Scherzer $17M/1, 41. Gibson $14M/1, 45. Verlander $13M/1, 48. Ogasawara $13M/2 34. Minter $18M/2, 38. Yates $15M/1, 40. Kittredge $15M/2, Kahnle $14M/2, Robertson $12M/1 43. H-S Kim $12M/1 49. H Bader $9M/1, 50. Turnbull $8/1M NR: Morton $8M/1, Kershaw $7M/1. T Williams $7M/1, L Lynn $6M/1, Junis $5M/1 Jansen $10M/1, Martin $12M/2, Sewald $7M/1, Leclerc $10M/2 Grichuck $16M/2, J Turner & JD Martinez $7M/1
  5. We overpaid for Crochet, but I think it is the price needed to pay for what we needed most. Crochet has questions, but he's younger than any FA signing would have been. I'm not high on the Buehler pillow contract, but he looks like a better bet than Kluber, Richards, Wacha and Hill were, but at double the cost, that is expected, The Chapman signing was okay, but not instead of adding a closer. If this is all we do, I'm not happy, at all. We basically traded for a two year window with Crochet, unless we extend him, so we need more to make a strong push. (Bregman, Burnes or Scott/Hoffman.)
  6. I thought maybe he could be had for a 4 year deal between $76-80M.
  7. Not sure what we'd have to add. I think I heard they want to start playing Raleigh less and less at catcher.
  8. I would not consider moving Bello from the rotation. He's my 3 or 4, depending on Buehler. I have KC going to the pen with Gio as the #5. I'm fine, if you don't like numbering the rotation. It does not really matter in many senses, but it seemed to me, like it does matter to you. No biggie. MVP is not a big Bello fan. There are reasons not to. I really like Bello's chances of breaking out, in 2025.
  9. I wonder, if that deal offer is true, how much money we offered to offset Yoshi. I'm thinking maybe we need to offer $12-14M x 3 to get close to a yes.
  10. Sox sign Noah Davis to minors
  11. You did "care" where someone ranked Bello, and you mentioned in the same post that you felt he could be our #1. I'm not sure why you argue with the guy who agreed with you on Bello, while saying you don't care about rankings but go on and on about them.
  12. So, do you or do you not give a "rats ass" about who does better? I really like Bello and place him as our 3 or 4 slot SP'er, as of now. I think he can and will get better as he matures. You started this whole thing by saying Bello may end up the best SP of the group, and I agree. He can. We do not have anyone proven to be a sure bet ace, but you have to expect some push back on how our SP'ers are slotted, on paper, as of now- based on what we have seen from all of them.
  13. Even if you take away 2024, his history was better, although doubts about 150+ IP were present.
  14. 13 is too many? (The ones in parenthesis are in AAA . I listed Crawford as the 6th starter and in the pen.) Do you think the STL offer was fair?
  15. Houck was "awesome" from 2020-2022. For a young RP/SP who struggled in the 5th IP as his only weak point, other than injuries, he was damn good. His history blows Bello's away. With him, it's all about staying healthy and proving he can go 175+ IP back-to-back. Bello has to prove he can even pitch 75% as well as Houck does. Bello has also never pitched 178 IP, like Houck has. His tops is 162. Counting the minors: Bello: 118 IP in 2019, 95 in '21, 96 in '22, 153 in '23 (minors+ majors), 162 in '23 (AAA+MLB) and 165 in '24 (AA+MLB) Houck: 300 IP in 3 college seasons ('15-'17), then 22, 119, 108, 90 in '21 (AAA+MLB,) 60 in '22 (almost all as RP,) 115 in '23 (AAA+MLB) and 179 in '24 I don't see an IP advantage to Bello.
  16. According to cots, we are under the tax line by $36M. Could this work? Sign: Teoscar Hernandez $76M/4 ($19M AAV) Lower AAV but extra year. Trade: Rafaela ($6.2 AAV x 7 years,) DHam, Cespedes, Sandlin and Fitts For: Arenado ($25.5 AAV after COL payments) and Helsley ($6.8 est final arb) + $10M x 3 years ($30M) We come in $1M under the tax line. 1. Duran CF 2. Teoscar LF 3. Casas DH/1B 4. Devers 1B/DH 5. Arenado 3B 6. Abreu RF (Anthony, eventually) 7. Story SS 8. Campbell 2B 9. Wong-Narvaez C Bench: Narvaez, Grissom, Refsnyder, Yoshida (Romy, Anthony, Mayer) SP: Crochet, Houck, Buehler, Bello, Giolito (Crawford) RP: Helsley, Chapman, Hendriks, Slaten, Whitlock, Crawford, Winckowski, Wilson (Guerrero)
  17. He does have one good thing going for him, over others: 2nd half of 2024 ERA: 3.47 Bello (1.225 WHIP was second to Nick) 3.48 Criswell (1.452) 4.20 Pivetta (1.150 was best) 4.23 Houck (1.36) 6.59 Crawford (1.249)
  18. Houck was awesome over his first 3 seasons with the Sox, despite missing some time in 2021 and 2022. His only bas year was 2023. Injuries are a concern with him, but I'm encouraged by his full 2024 season as a starter. 2020-2022: 150 ERA+, 3.02 ERA/2.95 FIP (His 69 ERA- ranked 30th out of 234 pitchers with 140+ IP.) He's been hurt, but he's only had one bad year. I like Bello, a lot, but he has yet to prove he can come close to what Houck had already done in all but one season. Crochet has major questions about his ability to pitch 150+ IP for the next 2 years, let alone 170 or 180. No doubt, that is a concern, but when you look at what our SP'ers have done, especially most recently, it seems totally logical to slot Crochet and Houck 1-2, knowing full well, MLB is fluid. Bello could be poised for a great year, or he could continue to decline, as he did in 2024. Buehler is the big wild card, in terms of range of projected 2025 production. Gio has not done much in 3 years. I can see slotting him 5th or even 6th.
  19. Indeed, Bello could easily be our #3. Gio, Buehler and Crawford all have serious questions, but so does Bello. He needs to show his 2024 decline was just a blip. ERA 4.24>4.49 (ERA+ 107>95) WHIP 1.338> 1.361 K/BB 2.9>2.4 2024 Rankings: ERA+ 137 Houck, 105 Criswell, 103 Pivetta & Wink, 98 Crawford, 95 Bello FIP: 3.32 Houck, 4.07 Pivetta, 4.15 Criswell, 4.19 Bello, 4.48 Wink, 4.65 Crawford K/BB: 4.8 Pivetta, 3.4 Crawford, 3.2 Houck, 2.4 Criswell & Bello, 2.3 Wink Certainly, Bello can improve, but in no way should he be called our 3rd SP. 4th or 5th sounds about right. Crochet and Houck are clear 1 & 2. Buehler has the potential to be our 1-2 and could be viewed as our #3, on paper, right now, but there are many questions. Giolito was one of MLB's top 10 pitchers from 2019-2021, but that seems like so far away. He showed some hope over the first half of 2023, but one half of a good season out of 6 halves is not good, at all. I'm fine with putting Bello 4 and Gio or Crawford 5th and 6th.
  20. We need all the help in the pen we can get. Crawford can eat a lot of innings there and spot start, when needed, thereby prolonging the need to call anyone up Wink and Whitlock (eventually) can go 2-3 IP, every few days. IMO, we still need a bonafide closer, badly. Making Hendriks & CHapman the set-up men looks pretty good, on paper. Slaten has the potential to be the third solid set-up man or 7th inning guy. The whole pen and pen depth gets much better, if we add a solid closer. That being said, I seriously doubt it happens.
  21. Something we could have used. ERA+/IP 2006: 142/241 (Led league) The Sox had 1 SP'er w an ERA+ over 103 (40 starts from scrubs) 2007: 109/211 The Sox had just 2 SP'ers over 108 (Beckett & Schill) Tavarez had 23 GS at 92 ERA+ 2008: 92/200 Buchholz had a 69 ERA+ and the 5th most GS 2009: 110/220 The Sox had 2 SP'ers over 111 (Beckett & Lester) Penny 83, Dice K 81, Smoltz 56 (44 GS total) 2010: 105/216 Buch led the majors at 187 and Lester was at 134, but the next 5 were below 100.
  22. He's already way better than Wong on D- not a hard thing to do, but reports say he is a plus-plus catcher on D. Compared to Wong in the minors: Wong: .276/.337/.496/.832 (AAA .327 OBP/.471 SLG w 23 HRs & 138 Ks in 563 PAs) Narvaez: .250/.364/.382/.746 (AAA: .371 OBP/.400 SLG w 21 HRs & 196 Ks in 762 PAs) Narvaez: Way better D, better OBP Wong: better SLG Pretty close on K rate and HRs in AAA.
×
×
  • Create New...