Jump to content
Click here to check out our updated free agents rankings, now up to 150 players and sortable by position! ×
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    109,049

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    164

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    But, JF is happy they were aggressive, right?
  2. moonslav59
    If we get a clean-up hitting 1Bman and bring Nunez back, that could be all we need to squeeze out HRam, unless we end up needing Nunez at 2B or elsewhere a lot.
  3. moonslav59
    Totally agree. Even with all the injuries this staff has gone through, and now the Pedey, Nunez and Betts health issues, it looks like all the pieces might all come back just in time for the playoff run.
  4. moonslav59
    You're probably right, but he might be stretched out enough for 5 innings in 16 days from now. Also, we have the day off after game 4, so the pen can all be used, if needed.
  5. moonslav59
    I'm not sure 9 days off is good for Sale either, despite me thinking he probably is fatigued.
  6. moonslav59
    I'm not counting Price out of the #4 starter conversation either. We're more than two weeks away (Oct 9th) from the 4th game of the playoffs.
  7. moonslav59
    Yeah, it's not a "sure thing", and maybe I've been too optimistic all year, but this team is too good to choke this away.
  8. moonslav59
    If we have someone equal or better to HRam to play, I doubt a union grievance will carry much weight, despite what pace he's on next year.
  9. moonslav59
    Good point, and he's already showed he is unfazed by high pressure. I still think HRam has a chance to shine.
  10. moonslav59
    HRam and Betts are perhaps our best hopes at showing some dominant power in the playoffs.
  11. moonslav59
    Like all in for Price? Or, all in for Sale?
  12. moonslav59
    Yes, it's no coincidence that the 3 rings we got involved these key elements: 2004: Pedro, Schilling & Foulke 2007: Beckett, Schilling & Papelbon 2013: Lester, Lackey & Uehara 2 aces and a top closer goes a long way. Longer than having 9 bash brothers in the line-up and no pitching.
  13. moonslav59
    Just about every DD trade has looked good (so far).
  14. moonslav59
    I don't want to jinx anything, but we've had this thing wrapped up for a week.
  15. moonslav59
    I can't see DD not going all in for a big bat clean-up hitter. It is so clearly our weakest point.
  16. moonslav59
    You don't think we'd be up by 15, if we were leading the league in runs scored right now? Okay, maybe it was a bit hyperbolic, but we'd clearly have clinched by now. BTW, our run differential is now 139. If we scored enough to lead league in runs scored this year, we'd have to add about 80 runs (or actually take that away from those ahead of us) making our differential about + 220.
  17. moonslav59
    Funny how 3 starts ago, people were taking about him being our #2 or 3.
  18. moonslav59
    ERod's got his ERA below 4.00 now. He's gotta be our number 3 now. Game 1 Sale Game 2 Pom day off Game 3 ERod Game 4 Porcello/Price if up 2-1 or Sale (on 3 days rest) if down 2-1 day off Game 5 Sale (or Pom, if Sale was used in game 4)
  19. moonslav59
    If you're not going to go in hard, then just stop at 2nd. Plus, the play is in front of you.
  20. moonslav59
    Nobody expected that, even with the loss of Papi.
  21. moonslav59
    Agreed. Had we scored 100 less runs and the rest of the league wasn't going bananas, we'd be ahead by 15 games right now.
  22. moonslav59
    Yes, totally facetious. I'm the self appointed leader of the expose the excessive boneheadedness club.
  23. moonslav59
    ERod has the 3 slot locked up.
  24. moonslav59
    No, apparently this isn't "boneheadedness", it's aggressiveness that is encouraged by JF & Co.
  25. moonslav59
    The "M's"?
×
×
  • Create New...