For argument's sake, let's say by mid July, HRam is on pace for 500 PAs and just barely reaching his vesting option.
He's doing "decent" enough: .825 OPS, but he's .900 vs LHPs and .790 vs RHPs.
Moreland is doing pretty much the same and is at .790 vs RHPs. Moreland is the better fielder.
Would you start Moreland vs RHPs more often vs RHPs? It's the better choice for improving our chances at winning? (Would HRam feel okay with the choice?)
What if HRam is at .800 vs RHPs, and Moeland's at .780? Moreland's defense probably makes up for the .020 in OPS?
Do you use OPS?
It's not really going to be a cut and dry choice, and I'm pretty sure HRam might view the ultimate choice differently, if he comes up short due to being benched for Moreland, regardless of the OPS differential and all the explaining that can be done.
I hope it turns out to be an easy choice, and we're probably arguing about the one scenario that won't happen, but if it's a close choice, the choice is obvious to me: keep HRam from 497.
If it's not that close, but somewhat close, then the debate can begin, IMO.
Right now, I'd start the season by sitting HRam vs about half the RH'd starters and let him convince me by doing better than Moreland & Swihart by a clear enough margin to overcome his defensive disparity with Moreland..