Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,904
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. Would any GM sign Eovaldi for $34M/2, this winter?
  2. Here's a 3-way: TB: Vazquez, Brasier SD: Eovaldi, Gomez BOS: N Anderson, Kiermaier, Mejia, Myers
  3. Makes the 2020 season much more bearable.
  4. This is just like big Sox win.
  5. It accepted my deal without those 2 pitchers.
  6. Another one: Vaz, Covey & Shawaryn for Kiermaier & Nick Anderson (Anderson would be a major get. Kietmaier is a top rate defender who is owed $24M/2 but the lux number is just $9M x 2.)
  7. This deal was accepted by BTV: Eovaldi+ Beni to MIL Cain (CF), Sutter (RP),Nottingham © & Vargas (SS). Cain is still an excellent defender in CF. He's owed $35M/2 but the lux number is $16M x 2. Eovaldi+ Beni=$22M/yr. We save $6M a year and fill the CF slot, a RP'er slot and help the farm out a little. The Brewers break even on actual money spent. Maybe we could pry Hader, Williams or Peralta, instead of Suter, but Suter is pretty good.
  8. Another great one.
  9. I was talking per year. ($16+8.5=24.5). Actual money saved was $48M Price and maybe $17M Eovaldi= $65M total.
  10. Well said. Look, I'd love to have a healthy Eovaldi for 30 starts or even 24 starts and a healthy post season, but I'm tired of broken down starters. I loved Buch, but he drove to be like this.
  11. With the $16M and & $8.5M "saved" by not paying Price & Eovaldi, we could just about get Bauer. I'd trade price & Eovaldi for Bauer in a heartbeat- same cost.
  12. Again, it's not about Odor.
  13. Again, it's not about Odor.
  14. Again, it's not about odor. By taking Odor, or just paying $8M a year for two years, we sweeten the return players. I've said it numerous times. It's not about Odor. We could cut him, and the deal still could be a big plus for us. There are other players out there, better than odor, who play CF, 2B or RP'er and are paid more than their team wants to pay them. The idea is to take back a lesser salary dump, so the other team will give us something else of value PLUS we use the savings to get a better pitcher than we otherwise could not have afforded. You guys keep harping on the Odor-type players I bring up. IMO, it's better to take back a player and their salary than to just pay equal in cash. The worst that can happen is we cut Odor, and it's the same as paying $8M x 2 years towards Eovaldi's deal- like we are now paying half of Price's deal.
  15. Unless he flops, gets hurt or COVID kills player salaries, he's going to opt out. Yes, it hurts!
  16. Odor has hit 30+ HRs three times and averages 28 per 650 PAs. Yes, he averages 150 Ks per 650, but here's Chavis: 27 Hrs per 650 215 Ks per 650! (His OBP is about 15 points higher, but his SLG is about 15 lower.) Again, I'm not gah-gah over Odor. We may end up cutting him or trading him elsewhere. The main part of the deal is to... Cut $9M a year from our tax budget Add another 2 players to fill a current gap (CF, SP, 2B, RP?) Dump an unreliable pitcher Add a more durable pitcher with the savings We will be signing 1-2 SP'ers. Adding $9M/yr to their salaries may greatly improve their quality and/or reliability.
  17. I'm not loving on Odor, but he might be our best option at 2B. The point is this- rather than just pay half of Eovaldi's salary, take on Odor's. The plus is this: We get someone else besides Odor, maybe just a prospect or someone like Taveras, a pre-arb CF'er, who fills another high need area at viryually no added cost. Now, we have 2 slots filled: 2B and CF. Now, we have $9M more to spend in 2021 and 2022. Add that "saved Money" to the spending budget we already have and upgrade your signings at SP and RP, our two highest need areas.
  18. My bad on Upton. Yes, the guy from the Rangers with mixed defensive metrics as a possible add on to an Eovaldi-Odor deal.
  19. We finished 5 games behind the Astros. That being said, we are better off by the deal.
  20. Any thoughts on Taveras?
  21. Think of what we get for $28M on the tax budget ($14M x 2 yrs). Barria is just 24, pre-arb and had a 1.113 WHIP, this year. Mayers may be a flash, but he had a nice season at 0.900 WHIP and a 2.10 ERA (12.9K/9 seems out of the blue)
  22. Which is not perfect but is a nice reference to use as a foundation for suggesting possible deals.
  23. I think the site does a pretty good job with the values, but of course teams have different needs and ways of evaluating talent on their own teams and other teams. Nobody is suggesting any accpeted trade means it would even be considered by GMs from either or even both teams.
  24. The trade simulator accepted this: Eovaldi & JD to LAA Upton (salary dump), Barria and Mayers Upton is owed $53M/2 and counts for $21M/yr on the tax line. JD is owed $39M/2 and Eovldi $34M/2 and their tax numbers are $22M/yr and $17M/yr ($49M total) LAA pays $20M more than Upton costs, but we save $28M on taxes. We could even pay some cash to offset it by more. I'm not sure LA trades two nice and young arms for two players they may not even want, but I'm sure they love to dump Upton and get something worthwhile. It also accepted Eovaldi for Odor and Taveras (pre arb OF'er) from the Rangers. We save $9M on the lux tax line, but the actual money is only $4.7M more a year for TX. Odor is near useless to them. We fill our CF slot (mixed defensive metrics), take a flyer on Odor at 2B and add $9M a year to our tax budget.
×
×
  • Create New...