moonslav59

With so many days off, early in the season, a 9 man pen would not be needed until mid April. The second point was that if one was needed, they are practicing just 2 hours away.

"Max Mojo Risin'!"

Who should lead off? Arroyo? Cordero? (I'm not saying I like Kike up first, but we have no clear lead off hitter.) If we take a 2-5 hitter and move him to #1, we severely weaken a key slot. Now, if Vaz keeps hitting like JD, then maybe...

I don't disagree, but the time and place Taylor can best succeed is tomorrow in AAA (alt site).

No. Perhaps "Nearly Upside Down" would have been better terminology.

Almost a 1/12th of the season over. Doesn't seem like that much, does it?

Upside down in the AL 10-4 Bos 8-5 KC 8-5 LAA 9-6 Sea 8-7 Oak 7-7 Cle 7-7 Hou 7-8 Bal 7-8 TB 7-8 Tor 6-8 CWS 6-8 MN 6-9 Det 6-9 Tex 5-9 NYY

You mean "then...?"

Boone has still had enough talent to do better. They both need to go, but as a Sox fan, they can wait another decade or so..

I just finished watching the game. I was thinking the exact same thing when they yanked Pivetta. This was a real nice win- in many ways.

Most managers don't make major line-up changes after 13 game sample sizes. If they did, they might not be around for long. That being said, leading Kike off, to begin with, was rather questionable, so the 13 game sample size seems to reaffirm the position that it was a mistake from the start. The one argument I will give in his favor is that we really don't have a clear choice lead off hitter on our team, and if we moved Verdugo or Bogey to the omne slot, we'd be opening a huge hole at a slot that might be even more important than lead off. Let's say we go like this: 1. Verdugo 2. Bogey 3. JD 4. Devers Now, we lost our great #5 hitter (Devers). Yes, Vaz looks like he's doing well enough to hit b#5, but I'm not sure I want him there, all year. What could we try, now? Arroyo #1? We'd have been laughed off the face of the earth, if we just suggested that before opening day.

Exactly!

And, here I thought the Sox had the worst defense in the division.

Some interesting Sox tidbits of data... 1. Don't look now, but Devers is catching up to JD's RBI lead: 16 JD 13 Devers 13 Vaz (5), Franchy (4) and Kike (4) combined! 2. JD at 1.307 in OPS! Wow! .935 Devers (after a slow start!) .888 Bogey (Mr. Consistency) .840 Vaz (time to talk extension, here?) .833 Arroyo (winning a slot) .833 Verdugo (2nd in PAs but the not a PA leader at any 1 position) (Nobody else is above Franchy's .667.) 3. Some worrisom OBPs: .243 Dalbec .250 Renfroe .255 Kike 4. JD and Devers have 10 of the Sox 16 HRs. 5. Marwin & Vaz lead the team in SBs with two. 6. Four of our five SP'ers have an ERA at 4.50 of lower (3 under 3.27). 2.08 Eovaldi 3.27 Pivetta 3.60 ERod 4.50 Perez 6.00 Richards (looked good in his last start) (Houck is at 3.00 as a SP/RP) 7. Our K/BB leaders 12.0 ERod 10.0 Houck 7.00 Barnes 3.50 Eovaldi 2.33 Andriese 8.OPS Against .087 Barnes (Let THAT sink in!) .273 Whitlock (Steal of the winter?) .387 Vadez (Demotion?) .503 Eovaldi .580 Sawamura .651 Perez .671 ERod .679 DHern (damn those 6 BBs in 28 PAs against!) .695 Houck .737 Andriese .777 Pivetta .798 Richards (looks better than the 6.00 ERA) .857 Brice (Why is he still around?) .952 Ottavino (Yime to turn it around.) 1.102 Taylor (May not see him again.) 9.Back to hitting: Splits vs RHP 1.576 JD .926 Verdugo .918 Devers .898 Vaz .855 Bogey .797 Marwin vs LHPs: 1.000 Franchy (2 PAs) .950 Devers .944 Bogey .923 Arroyo .900 Plawecki .795 Renfroe .748 Vaz .733 JD .774 Arroyo 10. Some more splits (team): .873 Away .698 Home .973 swinging at first pitch .792 team OPS overall and .789 Late & Close .615 1st time vs SP .760 2nd time .912 3rd time .872 vs RP 1st time 1.110 vs RP 2nd time

Maybe keeping this post near the top will keep the mojo risin'.

I think you should always take who you think is the best player, regardless of position or slot money considerations, unless you have 2 or more players rated very similarly, which could be the case at pick #4, this year. That being said, I hope the Sox rate a college pitcher highly enough to take at pick 4. If they take someone else, I'll trust they know more than I do or even all the mock draft sites. I will add something about catchers: catching prospects are probably the hardest to "get right." Some that are "gotten right" end up being moved to other positions. Although I often frown on anecdotal evidence, like the case of Roger Clemens, think of all the highly or somewhat highly rated young catchers we've had in our system (some by trade) who flopped (some moved up after being drafted by showing promise in the minors or early majors- I won't add Salty to this list): Kole Cottam (130th pick in 2018.) Austin Rei (81st pick in 2015.) Jon Denny (81st pick in 2013.) Swihart (26th pick in 2011- man, that was THAT long ago?) Lavarnway (was a 6th rd pick, though with Federowicz taken the next rd.) Kottaras (PTBNL in David Wells trade, and he actually went on to put up some decent numbers in MLB after being waived.) Schoppach (The one we got right: we traded away. 2nd rd 2001.) Marzano (taken in first round back in 1984) Marc Sullivan (2nd rd in 1979) Note: We did take Carlton Fisk in the first round in 1967, and that worked out well, but that was so long ago.

We’ve had an 9 man pen, and our starters have gone 5+ in every start but one. They may see some more action over the next few months, but so far, it has been far from overused.

I'm not sure how any MLB GM keeps his job without filling the SS position. Did he not notice he had 2 2Bmen and no SS?

No, it is clearly this one... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pv9ZGP1_JUo

The big question is, will we still put "4/16 White Sox @ Boston?"

Cashman needs to go. Period. (Boone goes by definition.)

Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I do not keep track of Yankee moves enough to remember getting rid of Estrada. Picking up and having to play Bruce & Odor so much exposes something awful. You know more than I do about the root causes of it, but yes- "Bizarre."

I hate 15 inning games. Period. The 7 inning doubleheader seems to cheapen history, but hey, 18 innings in one day is just too much.

Yes, the pitching depth was more heralded, and multiple injuries has been one reason they signed Bruce & Odor, but the fact that one or both are playing everyday, exposes one of two things (or both): 1) They are extremely injury prone (and have been for years). 2) They do not have the depth they bragged about. OF: Judge, Stanton, Hicks (looks solid) Frazier, Tauchman, Gardner Bruce & Florial IF: Andujar (IL), Urshela, Voit (IL) LeMahieu, Torres, Wade, Ford Odor & Peraza C: Sanchez & Higashioka

I've yet to hear a credible response to the point about the Yankees having such incredible depth, especially on the younger side. Why did they need to add Bruce & Odor?