Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,804
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. You responded to someone saying Porcello's 1.1% career HR % with a statement about HR% being mostly a fluke. His career number is not a fluke and is actually very decent. It counters your point about his high HR/FB rate argument, as well as the point I raised about his very nice 47.2% GB %. I still don't get your point and how small sample size HR rates have to do with the Porcello debate.
  2. Nick, I was agreeing with you, and yes, nobody can tell Sale not to be fierce. My point is he is more likely to go overboard in MLB than the minors and that is something the team controls. Like I said, at some point he will be ok to go all out. Does anyone know the exact date for that?
  3. You didn’t answer why HR% is a fluke. Why is his career HR% mostly a fluke?
  4. It’s hard to say who is the most hurt. I think players on other teams are worse.
  5. I agree, but there is one danger we have to admit is possible. Being the fierce competitor he is, he would likely throw harder in the bigs than in the minors. There comes a point where throwing your hardest is going to happen. Is that time now? One week? Two weeks? Next year?
  6. It makes sense for crappy hitters to learn to bunt, but if you are getting burned by the shift, it makes sense for those guys, too.
  7. Bunting is not easy, but it can be learned. Usually players bunt to a normal field, but bunting to a side of the IF with nobody there has to increase your odds of getting a hit. You have to be a good enough bunter to make your odds better than just swinging away, but is anyone good even trying to learn how to bunt, anymore?
  8. Sorry about your dog, Thunder. I know that hurts.
  9. Why is Wilson going to be any better? They could have had Cordero at 1B, Chavis at 2B and Kike in the OF.
  10. Yes, I didn't mean to imply you felt he might not trade prospects. I'm sure Bloom has identified a few prospects and ML players like Chavis, maybe as many as 5-8, that he feels may not be good enough to be on next year's roster, but who might still have some trade value. By trading some of these guys, he won't be mortgaging the future unless one of these players ends up surprising Bloom by being better than he realized.
  11. Ted was a freak. Of course I'm not thinking he needs to change his approach, but most hitters are better if they can go the other way. If trying to do so would mess them up, then learn to BUNT, for god's sake!
  12. Those Aug-Sep numbers look real good.
  13. I've said all along getting a salary dump type player at the deadline makes the most sense, since the prospect return will be lower, but we have a few million to play with, and I think Bloom will try to get a very helpful piece that still keeps us under the tax line. That being said, if he can get someone way better, but we have to go over the line to get him, I can see him do that, and I'd have no issue with it. I just think there is a priority not to go over. Not a mandate. Also, I could see us trade for a high priced player, then trade Richards, Perez or Sawamura to keep us under the line and free up a roster slot for Sale and Sawamura.
  14. In theory, this makes the most sense, and I think that was the goal of Theo and Ben, too. In reality, I think you get to a point where you think this is the year, and you splurge, when maybe you didn't really need to, but with the randomness of the playoffs, you go overboard just to "make sure." Personally, I don't see 2020 as a year to "splurge," and it seems like Bloom & Co. did not see it that way, last winter, but we have won more than expected, and maybe that has changed. Certainly many posters want us to make a big splash or two, which would have to be at the expense of future projected productivity. I'm thinking Bloom still has his eye on the long term, but we have some pieces that are not part of the long term plan we can afford to trade. The question is, how much do other GMs want those pieces and what will they give us for them? It might not look like much, but Eovaldi and Pearce did not look like all that much in July 2018.
  15. Many times, yes, but when you put up .550-.650 OPS against in the later months, I'm not seeing a problem.
  16. It's not a "big deal," but it's also not something you just do because you can. Having one extra year on the back end of this rebuild is of value. The choice is about is going over, this year worth more than having to pay big taxes or reset again 2-4 years from now, when this team rates to be even better than now. Of course, there is no guarantee we will be better in 2023 and 2024 than now. We may kick ourselves in a couple years for not going all in, this year. I like Bloom's outlook and philosophy. It jives with mine.
  17. 2020 was a cluster. I think Ottavino had one bad game that ruined his stats- the sample size was so small. in 2019, his OPS Against was... .724 June .683 July .634 Aug .641 Sept 2018: .604 July .638 Aug .542 Sept How RECENT are you looking at? His post season sample size is under 8 innings.
  18. I totally agree, but that does not mean he won’t trade any prospects. I think he’s looking at who will be squeezed from next years roster or taken in Rule 5 and may trade 2 or 3 for one helpful piece- maybe even a rental.
  19. Going the other way should be part of any good hitters approach
  20. They explained that their projected production from Hill was not as high as other starters they currently have. I don’t think they are done buying and selling.
  21. All they have to is learn to bunt. Their egos are too big for that.
  22. Of course I remember you. Several players have not gotten a longer look due to us winning so much. I think we may see two 2 for 1 deals, soon. One may look like a seller move to make room for Sale and Sawamura. One may be to ease this winters roster decisions and add a 1bman or RPer to the mix.
  23. We were snake bitten, yesterday. The Yanks got two bloop hits down the line and our two hits down the line ended up bouncing to the SS for asingle and bouncing into the stands to prevent a run.
  24. Welcome back Yaz. We missed you. You make some good points.
  25. I’m not not ever have been for a 13 man pitching staff, but that seems to be their choice. My point was that even with 13 pitchers we have a tough demotion or DFA or trade away to make, so if we trade for a pitcher, he has to better than Sawamura. That might be too costly. That being said, I’d rather trade for pitching than 1B. We may do nothing or next to nothing.
×
×
  • Create New...