Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,804
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    128

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. We have a few players that need to be "trimmed" from the roster by Rule 5 & FA signing time, so we'll do something. It might not be big or even moderate.
  2. We face another lefty. Let's hope ERod is over whatever that was his last start. Mojo Magic Time!
  3. They won't even take Groome, Yorke and Bonaci. (IMO)
  4. Ward might not even be protected for rule 5.
  5. I'm praying to God this is fake news.
  6. i'm lovin' this. Trade for scherzer, now!
  7. Indeed. Richards should be traded with cash for nothing.
  8. More proof that Cashman is the best thing to happen to the Sox.
  9. If he could just transfer that D to 1B!
  10. Great game! Looks like Houck may stick in the rotation. (I'm done with Richards- totally.) My first game thread undefeated record remains intact.
  11. Only on a clean inning with plenty of time to warm up. He's no worse than Andriese or Workman.
  12. Buyers! What fools!
  13. Arauz or trade for Schoop, who can play 1B and 2B (until Arroyo returns).
  14. That's a nice batting order. First game, I said Dalbec was going to bust out, so I'm going reverse here: Dalbec will go 0-5 with 4 Ks.
  15. What about getting Boyd and Schoop?
  16. Get it done, tonight. Keep the moon magic undefeated in first game threads. We need the bats to wake up. Let's see how Houck steps up to deliver when needed.
  17. This is not a one game frustration post: I'm done with Richards. I'd pay a team to get him of our roster. Richards, $2M and Potts for nothing.
  18. I think I said the could have stripped their title, not that I think they should have. They could have been stricter to us, too.
  19. If you get caught, you're not that good at it.
  20. I'm not sure that's a stat that projects future performance, and it's a small sample size. I'm not saying it's not a useful stat, but their team looks good, on paper.
  21. No.I never said they were. I said HOU was. I said the CWS are tough. Why is record vs .500 suddenly the be-all-end-all stat?
  22. Well, today's mantra is "everyone's doing it, so why..."
  23. They already are. When are those two expected back? (or are they, this year)
  24. He's on pace to blowing away his defensive innings at catcher. Plawecki has done a fine job. I'm sure Cora knows what he's doing, but I think we'll see Vaz getting more time off, going forward.
  25. You're killing me, Max!
×
×
  • Create New...