Again, saying it's "not coincidence" is not adding anything to your point. There is no evidence that proves or even implies it can't be a coincidence.
On top of that, your point is also dead wrong.
Kershaw has shown he does very well under pressure over a much greater sample size than his playoff one:
His career OPS against is an astounding .582. A number that is not easy to obtain and maintain, yet look at these sample sizes and numbers under pressure:
.502 2 outs RISP (853 PA sample size)
.547 Late & Close (712 PAs) There very definition of Clutch Pitching
.577 in September (1517 PAs)
.581 within 1 run (60115 PAs)
.582 RISP (1890 PAs)
.582 Tie game (3378 PAs)
.585 Men on Base (3482 PAs)
.599 High Leverage (1604 PAs)
His playoff sample size is under 750 PAs, yet you choose that much smaller sample size to "prove" it's all about him wilting under pressure, and not only that, it can't possibly be for any other reason, except he's not clutch.
Show me some proof that is the reason. Just showing he did poorly in the playoffs does not prove the reason- just the event.
You'd think some proof might be he also sucks under pressure during teh year, but in fact, the opposite is true.
You'd a think some proof might be that it can't be random, because randomly generated numbers would show his results are statistically impossible, yet the facts actually prove that not only is it possible, but it's right in line with what to expect.
Show me something other than he sucked under pressure, but only playoff pressure, so that proves he is not clutch.