Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    105,052
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    132

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. He may end up be a decent to very good platoon bat.
  2. He actually had plenty of RBIs per hit before 2022, so I'm not so sure he's anti-clutch, although I don't believe in clutch as a skillset. He had an .818 OPS w RISP, in 2021. All I'm saying is, we should not write him off, just yet. Some players bloom late. We have several worse players to remove from the 40, before him. If we add a 1Bman/DH, we may trade him, this winter. If not, he'll stay in the system, until we find more out about Casas.
  3. I think Boggs hit in the low .700's his last year in BOS, but he still had good years left in him. The idea that Cooper was some can't miss prospect was a joke.
  4. I'm not expecting greatness from this group, but we should be able to improve on our 2022 numbers at DH, 1B and RF without adding any major contract. I do hope we add a RF'er and keep Dugo in LF, but if we upgrade bigtime in other areas, only a slight improvement in these 3 areas may be all that is needed- NOT greatness: 1B: .668 270 PAs .606 Dalbec (bad D) 160 PAs .806 Cordero (horrific D) 61 PAs .699 Casas 45 PAs .611 Hosmer DH: .750 565 PAs .771 JD nobody else with more than 19 PAs, but were very bad, combined RF .659 222 PAs .620 JBJ in RF only 189 PAs .863 Dugo 79 PAs .677 Ref 50 PAs .444 Arroyo 50 PAs .341 Cordero 23 PAs .435 Duran
  5. There is a lag between building up a far, which may take 2-4 years to accomplish and when you start seeing results from the rebuild, which may be 3-6 years depending on the ages of prospects you draft and sign. Add the two together and you get a 5-10 year time frame for any expectation for seeing results, unless you trade for near ML ready and promising prospects. Look back 5-7 years from now, and look at what was going on with our farm. Were we adding or subtracting from it? The results were predicted back then, by many of us. They were denied by others. Others suggested we could rebuild the farm very quickly, but neglected to consider the lag time between that and seeing results. DD did draft and sign some good players, but all we've seen of any note have been Houck, dalbec & Duran. Some are suggesting we repeat the 2015-2018 farm plans. Rinse- repeat- get burned.
  6. I'm always for adding pitchers, and I'm not taking 5th starter types, either. I realize taking pitchers with healthy backgrounds makes more sense than those without. I agree on this. I don't know much about Kelly, but he could be a nice addition.
  7. Well, Roger did deserve some level of criticism: 1986-1992 160 ERA+/1.09 WHIP/3.44 K/BB 1993-1996- NO SMALL SAMPLE SIZE! 130 ERA+/1.29 WHIP/2.36 K/BB Had he only started using steroids, earlier, he may have retired a Red Sox.
  8. We may add a cheap 1B/DH or RF/DH type, but I doubt we spend much there. (I do think we sign a legitimate RF'er- maybe Nimmo, who would be seperate from the cheap DH type, and if we do sign a RF'er, the DH would probably be a 1B/DH type.) vs RHPs Casas (when not at 1B) Hosmer E Valdez (if not in AAA) Cordero (if not in AAA) vs LHPs Dalbec Refsnyder (when not in RF) Pham (when not in LF) Wong (when not catching) Arroyo (when not at 2B) That being said, if going with some sort of rotation involving players from this list, who make the 26, so we can spend more on pitching RF and SS, I'm all for that idea. We don't need everyone on the list to hit well- just 2-3. One problem might be having to cycle through 2-3 failures before we hit on the 2-3 that work out, if ever. By then, too many losses might have occurred to recover from. (Kinda like 1B, this year.)
  9. Since he can play DH (very well on D-LOL), 3B (well enough) and maybe 1B, I doubt he would be passed over by any lower- tiered team. There are a lot of players better than replacement level, but not by much, still hanging around. His offensive potential is too good to pass up, and for that reason, I'd keep him in AAA, until he runs out of options and decide, then. While we may have a roster crunch, this winter, especially if we add 5-6 players via free agency or trades, there are 7-10 players I'd trade or DFA before Dalbec.
  10. Very well said, and even if we do re-set, this year, we will still be able to spend enough to get a very good SP, RP, SS and RF'er. If we can trade for one, the other 3 can be upgraded, in theory, with more money allocated.
  11. With STORK, you can't follow logic to make conclusions. He may still be a Yankee fan.
  12. I had slim hopes we could finish the season with a winning record vs one ALE team (BAL), but those hoes are dashed.
  13. I have him slotted as the 7th or 8th RP'er "who could easily be beat out," and that is being "very generous?" Or course, a lot depends on how many pen arms we sign, too.
  14. These are the types of deals we may be looking at. I'm not sure past durability is a sign of future health, though.
  15. My point is, what if they don't "short-change" him, but some other team offers him some absurd amount?
  16. JD was a fantastic player for us. He's on the decline. I was only talking about improving on our .750 DH OPS, this year, not JD's overall .771 OPS, although I do think some sort of platoon can reach .775. (Dalbec, Arroyo, Pham, Hosmer, Refsnyder, Wong, EValdez) It's not a slight on JD to have high hopes for other Sox players.
  17. He also forgets how he looked at the 2020 team and thought it impossible to turn things around in just 1 year. He projected doom 2 years ago. He thought we'd be pretty good, this year. We should be happy he's predicting doom, again. He's never right.
  18. Seabold may be pitching his way off the 40.
  19. 15 Hits + BB (men on base) 14 outs Only 5 runs
  20. Casas, Ref, McGuire and Almonte have been on base 7 out of 10 times. 5 Hits 2 BBs
  21. The Ed Armbrister no call.
  22. I'm probably in the minority thinking we'll be better, overall, at catcher with McGuire & Wong over Vaz/Plawecki. We should be better at 1B w Casas. DH is not as bad as it sounds: JD vs Dalbec/Hosmer (Arroyo/Pham/Refsnyder/EValdez), but that's because we remember the great JD. Pham is better than Duran & JBJ, and more from ref can't be as bad as they were. Sure, it's not a winning combo, but it's an improvement, and I have to think we add a RF'er, so we are now looking at Pham/Ref as subs not starters, and both are better than Duran/Cordero/Arroyo of 2022 in the 4th OF'er slot. It comes down to replacing Bogey and adding a RF'er. All this means nothing, if we don't significantly add to the pitching staff. Sure, more from Bello, Schreiber, Houck and Whitlock and maybe a boost from German, Kelly or a resurgent Barnes or Taylor can take up some of the slack, but replacing the innings from Wacha, Nate and Hill will not be easy. Bringing Wacha back may go a long way to balancing 2022 and 2023 out, but we still need a big plus beyond maybe staying even with Wacha returning. I still think we trade for a solid SP'er, bring Wacha back and leave the rest of the rotation to what we have in the system. Bello takes Hill's slot and Sale/Paxton might just be counted on as gravy. (Somehow, I get the feeling we add just one SP'er and count on one or both of Sale & Paxton combined to give us 33 starts. Add two solid pen pieces (not expensive ones but better than Diekman.) Make our SS/RF positions combined better than Bogey/JBJ were- somehow, somewhere.
  23. I guess he's so fat, his ankles gave way.
  24. And that is because of poor lower body conditioning? The kid has missed way less time than Judge, and you were taking like Judge was Lou Gehrig. He'll be fine on an 8 year deal. Much better than Judge on a 7 year deal.
×
×
  • Create New...