moonslav59

Clarification does not work with you.

You answered your own question- it's because they are choosing to be half-ass in, until they think the moment it right-- not when we think it is. They may have signed Yoshida and Story thinking the fans would be under the impression we were trying to win it all, but also that both would still be productive when the time actually came to "go all in"( 2024? 2025?) It is clear they did not think we had a chance for a ring, or they would have signed more or better than Kluber. They played it half-ass at the deadline, too- same as 2022. The only meaningful dals they made at both deadline had to do with the longrun outlook (Abreu, EValdez, Rosier, McGuire and Urias.) Personally, not that it matters what I think, we could have been close enough to compete, this year, with just one or two more moves or two better moves. I also think the system is moving in the right direction, so I don't get upset as most seem to, but I'm still pissed.

They did take it into account, and that's why they chose not to go all in, last winter, sadly.

Does it matter what you heard? You'd just misrepresent what was said, anyway.

Who is saying Bloom's building of a MLB roster a success? I don't think it is "pathetic" to say our ML roster might be as good as or better than Philly's or some other teams with slightly better records, who happen to play in easier divisions and or have easier or much easier schedules. Yes, Bloom's job is to build a better team than at least 3 other ALE teams, in order to have a real shot at the playoffs. He's done it once in 3 years, and I'm not counting 2020. He has not been a success, in this way, but one can easily argue, he has built 2 or maybe 3 teams (2021 and 2023 and maybe '22) that were pretty good and might have made the playoffs by merely being placed in another division, I don't see that as "bad luck." Bad luck, to me, is having more injuries than other teams from players not viewed as injury prone, of getting bad calls by umps, or the sun was in Verdugo's eyes- that kind of thing. One can argue we have not been as good or better than Philly, Minnesota, the Cubs or several other teams, despite not being "successful." I brought up the DD- Bloom comp a couple days ago to show how similar the teams have been, but how wildly differently they are viewed due to a situation totally out of anybody on the Sox control. It's not excuse making. It's not proclaiming Bloom is a success. On 26 man roster construction, he has not been that. I have yet to hear one person say that, but there is a legion of posters who pretend there is a posse of posters who think Bloom shits gold bars.

Yess, if it was complaining, which I have done in the past. I merely wondered what the odds would be, this time.

Nobody gets a pass, but it is clear what their top priority is and has been since we failed to make any big prospect trades or big signings from 2019's extensions to Sale & Bogey to the Story signing in March 2022. That was 3 years of squat, followed by 2 more years of a con game- pretending we were trying to build a top contender.

We've been above .500 way more than at .500 or below, but your point is well-taken. It's the same for teams barely better than .500, too.

Wonder what the odds would be, if we switched divisions and or schedules.

Wonder what the odds would be, if we switched divisions. (and schedules.)

\Even Jeter made a nice catch (and won some GGs, too,) so what does that tell you?

Fair enough. He was good with the Sox prior to 2019. He did not finish in the top 12 on The Fielding Bible in '19 and '20. Maybe they've gotten better at picking these award winners, but I stopped valuing them, long ago.

POR won 4-2. Rosier 3-3 w 2B (.826) McDonough 3-4 Yorke 2-3 w BB Dobbins 7IP, 3H, 2ER, 3BB, 6K Woo up 7-1 in the 7th. Walter 5IP, 4H, 1ER, 1BB, 6K Hamilton 1-2 w HR and 2BB Kavadas 1-1 w 2BB Scott & Fitzy 2BBs each Rafaela 1-3

By the same voters who voted GGs to players who didn't even play 80+ games at the position they won at?

He never said "it doesn't matter how many prospects you have, or what the farm rankings are."

I read his whole quote, and I did not shorten it to make it sound like what you wanted it to sound like. Why would others who think prospects "do not matter" mean anything to anyone but you?

Yes, that was before his last 2 years with the Sox and after he left. That was a hell of a play!

Of course. We are not moving Devers to 1B, even if we did not have Casas at 1B. It's less than a 1% chance, but that won't stop me from voicing my opinion. I'm not sure how good Urias is at 3B, of if Reyes is for real and can be a FT 2Bman in 2024. Lots of ifs. Too many. I do wonder about maybe 2025: 3B: Story SS: Mayer 2B: Urias/Reyes/Yorke 1B: Devers/Casas DH: Casas/Yoshida LF: Yoshida/Duran/Refsnyder

Beni was not really a plus by the last 2-3 years on the Sox and after he left.

We could play Urias at 3B.

You misquoted him, took it out of context, then moved the goalposts. Typical. Cora does not think prospects don't matter. You think that is what he said and means.

I keep wondering why one of the 60 SSs we've drafted can't play 3B.

Nothing some ice couldn't take care of.

Okay. I guess I'm making it all up about you hardly showing your face, when we win, then make dozens of posts right after a loss, a losing streak or a trade of Kike.

You make no sense. When you blame Bloom for having devers and Casas on th roster, when they are both DD guys, I know about that. I don't see it as defending Bloom to point out they have nothing to do with Bloom. I see it as correcting a misconception you have and you propensity to blame Bloom for everything, even things beyong his control or mostly out of his control. I thought it was Bloom's fault for going over the tax line all along and blamed him for it, until someone mentioned, someone else claimed responsibility for the mistake, so now I am not sure. I'm fully ready to blame Bloom, if he was the one at fault. I can't find a story on Google, so I'm fine with bashing Bloom on that mistake, for now.