Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    103,066

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    127

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. moonslav59
    BINGO! Breggie also filled a bigger current need.
  2. moonslav59
    No way JH allows Breggie and Suarez to be signed. It was either or, hence the word "pivot" fits within that context.
  3. moonslav59
    Not if the no trade clause was prohibited. Not if JH set an AAV price, and the deferments were the only way to meet the dollar amount. Not if the offer Brez gave was the most he was allowed to give. If Brez offered the most he could, it kinda doesn't matter if he misjudges, bungled or botched the talks. Breggie was a goner. Breggie is a goner. It is kinda telling that the AAV on Suarez is about what the Breggie offer w deferments was. (Maybe it tells us nothing.)
  4. moonslav59
    How about a spitter?
  5. moonslav59
    I figured that out after the 4th time you said it.
  6. moonslav59
    IMO, they wanted Breggie at the price they set and no more (and without a no trade clause.)
  7. moonslav59
    I think in terms of the winter spending budget, the pivot fits: Bregman to Suarez.
  8. moonslav59
    You forgot Harrison will be worth $192M, so $8M is all we need from Hicks.
  9. moonslav59
    I do think many pitchers did better than expected. Hard to know if Bailey had a hand in any.
  10. moonslav59
    Anthony Eyanson... https://news.soxprospects.com/2026/01/following-national-championship-anthony.html
  11. moonslav59
    Maybe Bailey can work some voodoo magic on him.
  12. moonslav59
    Too funny! 🙃
  13. moonslav59
    I find it hard to believe they missed out on Breggie, and then began thinking about Suarez and signed him that quickly.
  14. moonslav59
    It is a stark turn-around in less than 3 years at the helm. While we do have some holes in the everyday player roster, the young talent and years of control create a situation where we may not need much everyday prospect infusion over the next 3-5 years. 5 years C Narvaez (3 Wong) 3 years 1B Contreras & Casas 3 years 2B Romy (4 DHam) 2-3 years SS Story w Arias & Soto in the top 10. 5 years 3B Mayer w Romero at #13. 9 years OF Anthony and 3 years LF Duran w J Gonzalez in the top 10 6 years CF Rafaela (Anthony) 4 years RF Abreu (Anthony) 9 years DH/LF/2B Campbell
  15. moonslav59
    BTV accepts DHam, Sandlin and Soto for Ezequiel Tovar. Do you? (It was scored by posters as 6-0 yes for Sox and 3-1 yes for COL.)
  16. moonslav59
    So, by all accounts, you botched your statement day one. 😝
  17. moonslav59
    I'm sure you'll accuse me of saying I'm over analyzing your chosen words, but on page one of this very thread, you wrote... "Yes I would say this most likely was a pivot, and wouldn’t have happened if Bregman would have signed."
  18. moonslav59
    It wasn't a $24M DFA dump, which is never easy: it was getting another team to take his full salary to even out the imbalance of the other trade pieces- like Duran>> Baty, but Duran+ Hicks= Baty + Suarez.
  19. moonslav59
    I guess if you only view it as a positional pivot, I suppose, yes. I think when the pivoted (financially and valuewise) from Bregman to Suarez, they knew they'd be getting a 3B/2Bman somehow and now had an added trading chip from SP'er depth that increased by one with the Suarez signing. (They may aslo trade an OF'er and keep the SP'er depth value. I'm honest about it. Not agreeing with your narrow view of a "pivot" is not being dishonest.
  20. moonslav59
    Only if we misread your actual words.
  21. moonslav59
    He has no options, so he's still around, because they want to take another look. It might not be a confident look, but he'd be gone by now, if they did not want to have a look-see.
  22. moonslav59
    As shaky as Mayer looked at the plate in limited MLB action, last year, he still hit .,739 v R. I'm not a fan of Romy at 3B, but his .978 split vs LHPs is talking pretty loudly. Together, they might hit .800+ We'd need a 2Bman, otherwise Romy might be our FT 2Bman and cannot platoon with Mayer at 3B.
  23. moonslav59
    It's not like trades after January are all that rare, and there are still a FA or two out there. Maybe some team is waiting to see what happens with Suarez, before a trade occurs. I'd feel okay with a 2B platoon of Mayer v R and Romy v L. I'm not sure I'd say the same about Romy at 3B, and a Mayer-Eaton 3B platoon is not on my radar. I hope it's not on Cora's either. Both Paredes and Donovan, as well as infielders like Baty, Vientos, Smith and Hoerner are still, bay all accounts, still available, and some of those teams need an OF'er and or a SP'er, where we have a couple logjams. I think a trade is still probable,
  24. moonslav59
    Oh, I'm pretty sure they think he's worth another look. The dumped Bernardino, Murphy & Guerrero to keep a roster spot warm for Hicks. I'm not against the idea that he could rebound. I was merely looking for a way to add two bats, since adding one big one seems like a lost cause, right now. I'm not "for" trading Abreu or even Duran, but we have a gaping hole at 2B/3B and big power bat. I'm not sure Paredes covers both openings with one move, so I looked for ways to add a 2B/3Bman and a power bat (E Suarez.) It was just looking for "a way." I do not think Brez is looking for "that way," at all.
  25. moonslav59
    It wasn't just Suarez: it was Baty and Suarez or Paredes and Suarez.
×
×
  • Create New...