The new spending was seriously curtailed from Bogey/Sale to the Devers extension in 2024. He was quickly traded, so even that one could not be counted, and the Bregman signing was one year, so one could argue 2020 to 2026 (Suarez) with just 2 semi-major signings and no major extensions. Those are facts not apologies.
I find it funny that I am accused of apologizing for JH, when I am highlighting his massive cutbacks to new spending. I can see how this can be viewed as an apology for the GM, as I am arguing their spending levels were vastly different from Theo, Ben & DD's, but it can't also be apologizing for JH, too.
To me, it's not impossible to build a winner withing the new spending budgets the Sox had from 2019 to 2024 (Devers) 2025 (Bregman) or 2026 (Suarez). Bloom failed, and Brez looked like he was turning it around and made 3 good major additions last winter, but the results are what they are, and there is no apology that can cover this mess.
Do you really think had DD stayed at the helm and extended Betts, we'd have had significantly more success under the same budgets?
Remember, had we extended Betts, we'd have spent less on "new spending" by $30M a year, which in some early years would have meant needing to trade some salaries to meet the budgets. It's easy to pick and choose, in hindsight, who we could have traded and added, and I don't doubt some GM or DD could/might have done better, but it's a stretch to think we'd win a ring from 2020-2026.