I'm going to say something here because people read gamethreads and almost never read general baseball discussions.
If asked what it takes to build a winning MLB team, most people would say pitching then hitting, but, if at all possible, have both.
Right now easily the three best records in the AL belong to the Sox, Guardians, and Rangers, who just happen to be ranked 1st, 2d, and 3d in the AL in runs scored. Conversely, the three best AL pitching staffs, defined as having given up the fewest runs, are the Guardians, Jays, and Astros.
Moreover, the pitching staffs--again, defined in terms of runs given up--are kind of tightly bunched. The Guardians are best at 626, but the Mariners, way back in 8th place, have given up 656 runs, just 30 more runs than the Guardians. The Sox lead the AL in runs scored with 830, and the 8th best team, again the Astros, has scored 678, which is a difference of 152 runs.
Also, the top six scoring teams are the Sox, Guardians, Rangers, Mariners, Jays, and Orioles--5 of which are likely to be in the playoffs. This is not true of the top 6 pitching staffs.
I am not anti-pitching. Far from it. I think our bullpen has been crucial to our success thus far in September. And I like moonslav and others get frustrated when our lineup gets shut down or limited to 1 or 2 runs. Nevertheless, it's also good to have a lineup that leads MLB in runs scored.