Maxbialystock

Damn right. Horrible timing for the OP.

Sorry, but I am truly indifferent to those awards, at least as regards the Sox. To me the most important thing by far is team performance and winning games. Do I think Mookie would be a good MVP choice? Sure, I do. But, being perfectly frank, I really believe the MVP on this team, beyond question, is David Ortiz, and I would never want to see a DH awarded AL MVP.

Exactly. Moncada has exactly zero sample size at AAA and before that he had exactly zero sample size of any kind of organized ball for something like 18 months. Heck, even his sample size at AA wasn't all that great. We can all see he has tremendous potential, but you have to grant us our right to question whether he is ready yet.

Moncada has great speed on the basepaths, which we have seen. If he plays 3B, he also has a great arm. But that long period of inaction--18 months of no baseball at all, I think--has clearly affected his ability to focus. He didn't just forget the number of outs, he got picked off 1B by a mile. And, unlike others cited--Trout, Betts, whoever--he has not had literally hundreds of opportunities to lose focus this season. He has lost focus repeatedly over just a short period. My guess is he daydreams about the expensive fast cars he bought with the $30M or whatever bonus he received last year. Putting him on the playoff roster will reinforce his impression that MLB is easy and the big money guaranteed for his level of talent. Effort and focus are not needed. If Farrell is playing favorites, it was Moncada who initially benefited when Farrell reportedly said Shaw needs to learn how to play the outfield, implying Moncada was a lock for 3B this year. If I'm right, that was a bonehead play by Farrell.

We will have to agree to disagree, then. I expect managers to make rational decisions and don't normally judge by the outcomes--what you call walking the tightrope and averting disasters. If anything, I agree with Kimmi that his chief contribution is in the clubhouse, which is invisible to us. I strongly believe that "head-shaking decisions" are mostly in the eye of the beholder and that making "sure nothing does go wrong" is impossible. If any manager could actually achieve that consistently, it wouldn't be baseball. Errors are made. Pitchers make mistakes. Batters miss pitches, signs, you name it. Baserunners make mistakes.

It is instructive to contrast this September with September 2011, which basically cost Francona his job because the Sox literally collapsed that September and the beer and chicken stories convinced the FO that Francona had lost the clubhouse. While I suspect Farrell has done well with the clubhouse environment/motivation, I think the real story is the September call-ups and the return of Uehara, Kelly, and Ziegler to the bullpen. Suddenly Farrell had some pretty good options out there in the bullpen, so many in fact that he could jerk a weak starter early in the game which he did repeatedly --as he had not done earlier in the season. I am not suggesting that Farrell is a genius. Far from it. I give the lion's share of the credit, as always, to the players, which is as it should be. During this transforming 8 game winning streak I give Farrell little or no credit for the fact that the Sox never scored fewer than 5 runs in any game. I do give him credit for using his bullpen well, especially in the first 4 games against the Yankees, but I also think those moves were just common sense. He was just using the tools the call-up and the return of Uehara, et al, had given him.

Meh. The real issue, as always, with the next game is the pitching matchup--Pomeranz, who has been lousy, vs. Archer, who is pretty good and was just that the last time he pitched against the Sox. The streak has to end some time, and this matchup could do it. Of course, I said almost exactly the same thing about game 2 in Baltimore when it was ERod against Gausman, and ERod was great and the Sox pummeled Gausman for 5 runs. The rotation wasn't that great in the first four games of the streak against the Yankees, but the deep bullpen and timely hitting still produced a sweep. Tiredness could be an issue, but, again, this team has played an awful lot of games in August and September and seemingly thrived. August 12-25 the Sox played 3 straight at Fenway against Arizona, then, without a travel day, played 1 in Cleveland, 2 in Baltimore, 4 in Detroit, and 4 in Tampa. They went 10-4 with the 4 losses coming in splitting the 4 in Detroit and the 4 in Tampa. Right now the Sox have the best road record in MLB, even better than the Cubs, who have the best overall record.

Worley meanwhile has pitched well, albeit briefly.

Price is throwing strikes, but clearly hitters right now are comfortable against him. These same Orioles were stymied two nights ago by ERod, another lefty and much younger and less skilled version of Price.

Actually, it worked. I think batters sometimes step out just to upset the rhythm of the pitcher. Tillman had just walked Betts to load the bases for the one and only, the bete noir, David Ortiz. Talking to the ump gave Tillman plenty of time to suck in some more pressure, and he threw four straight no question balls.

Not good when Price gets tentative against the bottom of the order.

Orioles 10-9 in September so far. Before this series they were 10-6. Agreed--no love for Showalter, so it's great to ruin his season.

Actually, a great move by Showalter. Bases loaded and Worley had no problem with HanRam.

Tillman struggling. Probably a good move to take him out after 2 straight walks and 63 pitches in 1.2 innings (and 3 runs).

This 7 game winning streak has a couple of distinctive features-- 1. The Sox scored no less that 5 runs in every game, but also never more than 7. One of the big complaints during the successful road trip when the Sox went 6-3 when winning all three series against Oakland, San Diego, and Toronto was the "feast or famine" from the lineup. That has temporarily ceased. 2. Bullpen has been great throughout the streak and pretty much during the 6-3 road trip. 3. The rotation was marginal in the 4 wins over the Yankees, but has been excellent so far in 3 wins at Baltimore--the latter a surprise because ERod and Buch haven't been that great lately. 4. While Ortiz and Ramirez continued to be our best run producers, others got some big hits as well. One of the wins was with Ortiz on the bench. Several wins were come from behind. In one win the Sox hammered Gausman, the guy who shut them out for 8 innings 6 days prior at Fenway, for 5 runs. The lineup seems to be jelling even though Leon has quit hitting, Bogaerts is up and down, etc. Benintendi is back and his swing seems as good as before. 5. 7 straight in September is a helluva statement, especially when it's been both home and away and against two teams with winning records. 6. So, yes, we want 8 in a row and Price is the guy to do it. It would be so, so nice to take 4 of 4 against the Orioles who have given us trouble in the recent past. And Price already has the 1-0 lead after 1. 7. But the 7 straight by themselves have already wreaked havoc with the AL East and very possibly with the AL as a whole. As I said last night, the Sox right now are 1/2 game behind Cleveland and 1 1/2 behind Texas for the best record in the AL.

BS. THat prediction was pretty darn good. If that's what you really meant, I agree. The rotation isn't fantastic yet, but ERod and Buch have in fact been keys to making it pretty solid.

I onder if our OP now sees that the incomprehensible thing was in his own mind. Others did comprehend, and JBJ is fine.

Probably Buch. ERod has better stuff but Buchholz has the experience. I would be happy with either one.

Out at a speaking engagement and find it hard to believe what happened in the 6th. The error by Davis was also a tough play--throwing across his body to a moving target. The dinger by Benintendi was simply unreal. The 7 great innings by Buchholz almost as unreal. As the announcers keep saying, as win tonight gives the Sox a 5 game lead over the 2d place Jays. More than that, a win destroys the Orioles on their field and in a series they absolutely had to win. What could be better? Early on, I thought the Sox could (not would) get into the playoffs. Right now they are playing like a team that could win the whole darn thing. ERod and Buccholz have pitched back to back gems. Porcello looks like an ace, and Price still has the capacity. The bullpen is definitely not great, but they are looking that way and definitely give Farrell a lot of good options. The hitting is also not great, but it sure as hell is timely.

Meh. Every team without exception has weaknesses. The great thing about the Sox right now is that their weaknesses are minimal.

This was a pretty big win--@Baltimore against their best starter and against a team that really needs a win. Shmucks. Still .5 behind the Guardians and 2.5 behind the Ramgers for best record in the AL. Today is September 21,for crying out loud. Wow.

Great call by Farrell letting ERod pitch to Trumbo with 2 out and a man on 2d in the 6th. Some risk, of course, but he has been pitching great tonight, and getting Trumbo out at a key juncture will set ERod up for the playoffs. He's still only thrown 87 and could come out to start the 7th.

Gausman is actually throwing a pretty good game, especially hitting those low corners. But this time the Sox are onto him. Too bad. Ortiz hit it good, but not quite good enough.

And of course they emphasize Betts cheap hits while ignoring the liners hit by other Sox right at Orioles outfielders.

I'm forced to watch the Orioles feed, and the announcers keep saying a 2 run lead is nothing. Then Machado walked, and they almost made it seem like a dinger by Trumbo was a sure thing. Laughable, especially when he lined to 3B to end the 4th.