And as I keep saying, what evidence do you have that the "League just isn't that strong?" Salaries are up, and so is the population base from which players are recruited.
You keep demeaning a .500 winning percentage as a sure sign of mediocrity when we have compelling evidence from last year that the difference between percentages of Atlanta (.640), Texas (.560), and Arizona (.520) last year were insignificant because Atlanta did not make it to the WS and both Texas and Arizona did.
And why did that happen? Because the statistical difference between 64%, 56%, and 52% is 12%, which is actually quite small.
What I also find interesting are these MLB team payrolls matched to their current won-lost records--
1. NYMets, $308M, W-L 32-37
2. NYY, $305M, 50-23
3. Houston, $250M, 32-39
4. Philly, $246M, 47-23
5. Texas, $232M, 33-37
6. Atlanta, $232M, 38-30
7. Dodgers, $230M, 43-29
8. Cubs, $225M, 34-37
9. Toronto, $224M, 34-36
10. Giants, $201M, 34-37
11. Boston, $182M, 36-35
17. Seattle, $142M, 42-31
18. White Sox, $136M, 19-53
20. Kansas City, $118M, 41-31
25. Baltimore, $101M, 46-24
26. Cleveland, $100M, 44-24
28. Tampa Bay, $98M, 33-38
Three of the top five team payrolls have losing records. And three of the bottom 11 payrolls are 41-31, 46-24, and 44-24.