Of course, and hence my insistence on the large part that randomness plays in the game.
However, 'hitting' is more repeatable and predictable than 'clutch' is. It depends on what aspect of hitting you're talking about as to how strong the year to year correlation is.
Batting average has a year to year correlation in the .45 ish range. As we all know, BA is not the best metric to use. OBP and SLG have year to year correlations in the .600 range, depending on what set of data you use. This is a fairly strong correlation.
Clutch statistics have a near 0 correlation, something like .02 to .04. Meaning none. Even BABIP has a correlation of .3 or .4, again depending on the set of data you use.
The higher the correlation, either positive or negative, the more that stat indicates 'true talent' as opposed to luck or randomness.
Incidentally, the three true outcomes of a PA, Ks, BBs, and HRs all correlate very well from year to year.