Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Hitch

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,020
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Hitch

  1. Which makes sense. The infield and outfield is about to be locked down for a fairly significant amount of time it appears. Start loading up on guys that will be coming 2, 3, and 4 years down the line.
  2. Yeah, that's what I figured. Hopefully a signing soon then (unless they have their eye on a Rule 5 guy to trade like last year).
  3. Preller seems to be lining up for a day of madness and mental trades. I wonder if we're among all that.
  4. Was Grissom on the 40 man? He was right? Surprised Schwarber got 5 x 30m. Fair play to him. I wouldn't want us doing that.
  5. Maybe go and ask someone who fits into those particular parameters?
  6. I guess therein lies the rub. I'll take the player that's performed to an elite level continually over a kid that has proven nothing and can't hit left handed pitching. Your weather analogy is rubbish. 🌞
  7. The vast majority of the time? Even though the vast majority of prospects flame out? I think that's pushing your narrative too far. Young and older players fall off cliffs all the time. One of the maddening reasons this game is so hard to get right.
  8. I'm not doing Romy and Crawford for 1 year each of Lowe and Diaz. Just go for Diaz and leave Lowe there.
  9. Anyone that says no to this is out of their mind.
  10. They're only two of the teams he's meeting. Anyone with an interest is the report, which would make sense.
  11. Yes you can. This deal doesn't stop you from making other moves. Obviously. If it was our only move, that would be another matter. And wouldn't make sense in any universe.
  12. We'll have to agree to disagree. Mayer has proven absolutely nothing. He's still a prospect who's a platoon player and nothing else right now. I'm not convinced we get anything exceptional from him between years 23-28, but I am sure we'll get some exceptional baseball from Marte over the next 2 to 3 years. I'd rather Marte at £17m over the pair of them at £30m+ personally. As I'm fairly sure we can find a player to offer us more than Mayer by trading from our sizeable depth in the outfield and starting pitching, and for not too much money. Regardless, I think we both agree that it isn't going to happen, as AZ seem to be after pitching by the sounds of things. But in saying that, the noise around Mayer is continuous. Interestingly, and somewhat connected, I just saw one of the big journos (forgot who already - not just the body going to s***) say that at no point did the Sox entertain Early discussions for anyone at the deadline.
  13. Crawford has had two pretty nasty injuries pitching wise in a right knee patellar tendinopathy that sidelined him early, followed by a season-ending right wrist injury. Health wise I think he probably has more questions marks over him than Dobbins with an ACL injury, though admittedly that's subjective. I don't think he is constantly judged just by that spell, but it has to be taken into account and can't be wished away as bad luck. I like Kutter, but I'm mot sure he has much of any value right now. If he has, I'd be okay us using it for sure.
  14. I get all that. I'm not saying this is the way we should go. I'm just saying if it's only what AZ want (seems unlikely) then I'd do it. I'd rather Marte for £17m and 5 years than Bo at £30m and 8 years personally. There's no clear indication Bo can play defence at 2nd yet - he's certainly awful at SS - though again I wouldn't be against us finding out in another scenario. I'd certainly prefer an outfielder or pitching was traded for Marte, but if it's Mayer I'd lose no sleep. We can then always trade from the outfield and/or pitchers to get other low cost infielders. We have a hell of a lot of flexibility right now because of the number of pitchers (most valuable trade commodity) and outfielders we have for trade. There's definitely better routes (for us) but I'm fine with it being Mayer if need be,
  15. Of course, but players are aging better than ever. And Mayer has proven absolutely nothing. He gets lumped in thought wise with Anthony in fans' mind. He is NOWHERE near that level. Nowhere. Most prospects (which I'd still count Mayer to be considering he's played so little) flame out. Not some. Most. There's nothing more exciting than seeing a prospect come up and thrive. But you should spend them relatively often for players that have a stellar record of delivering.
  16. Okay but when we were talking about whether we'd be better in certain situations a week or so ago you were highlighting all the steps forward players would be making, and dismissing regressions. You can't have it all ways Hugh! 😆 He's the single best 2nd baseman in the game. If you get a chance to get him, and for only $17m (LT tax hit) a year, you do it. Especially for an injury prone question mark. If we're worried about payroll or lack of infield depth, we can trade Duran for a young infielder. Or let Casas and Romy share 1st and go get a 3rd baseman. Getting Marte for Mayer is unlikely to happen, but it would make us hugely better with still plenty of flexibility to make trades for the other holes, or to sign FA's.
  17. I don't think it will likely be the ask - they seem to want pitching - but there's definitely noise around it. If it absolutely is who they want - you do it. We have no idea who Mayer is yet either as a hitter or around health, and at best seems to a platoon right now. If you can get THE best 2nd baseman (a position of need) who hits with power, then you do it and figure out the rest.
  18. I'd say Crawford has the better track record for sure, but we don't know how he's coming back from two major injuries and he gave up a lot of HR's. I'm not sure his value is very high to many teams right now. It sure wouldn't be surprise to me if teams valued Dobbins higher.
  19. Indeed. Sign Bregman. Or go for a stop gap and fix it next year if need be.
  20. I've been one of the posters advocating the most for trading KC - the kid has beefed up!
  21. Yeah, I don't see Bo going back to the Jays, and I don't see Schwarber going back to the Phillies. Though both are possible, of course.
  22. Why is giving up Crawford more crazy than Dobbins or Harrison?
  23. Again, agreed. I didn't see either of his last two trades coming. Not even imagined them. He's going to make some big moves this week, but they might not be obvious ones. And if nothing else, that's exciting. Seeing a lot of noise around Diamondbacks wanting Mayer for Marte. Do it all day as long as there are no character questions around Marte.
  24. Same. I really don't understand why people would think they are not going over.
  25. Criswell claimed by The Mets,
×
×
  • Create New...