Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

jad

Verified Member
  • Posts

    4,484
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jad

  1. An expanded playoffs necessarily means a shortened reg. season, correct? As if, say, a RS fan like me would watch, say, Colorado fighting it out with (is there a team from Arizona?) rather than listening to even a meaningless RS game? (which I do almost every night of the summer?). I'm not a big fan of play-offs in any sport, but MLB, particularly in the snow, is bound to compete with the NBA for being the worst.
  2. Not all things. I just read a study claiming, contrary to popular belief, it's not Don Juan's and what we used to call 'nymphomaniacs' who have the most sex, but rather boring, ordinary married folks! What this has to do with baseball, I don't know. But we have to talk about something ...
  3. Asking from complete ignorance here: athletes can perform WHILE ON downers or pain-killers? (I assume you can perform high on, say, weed [although personally, I don't trust myself to cross the street], and if old stories are right, on acid too [again, I wouldn't trust myself to pee on the wall]), but oxy? Really? Or are its effects different from garden-variety downers of years past?
  4. Question for those w/ experience in labor negotiations: my understanding is that when a side is negotiating in good faith, it does not suddenly throw in wild proposals (in its favor of course) out of the blue. So what's up with MLB's recent proposal to eliminate the number of minor leaguers? Wouldn't this be like the Union coming in and suddenly proposing, oh, a 100-game season with two weeks vacation in July and 40 acres for each player? Or is this just one of the annoying tactics that is ordinarily used during negotiations?
  5. If they do that, owners will probably go full Doc Rivers and sign away all the excess, unspent cash to their sons.
  6. Ha! Excellent point! The first step is for us all to admit we have a problem.
  7. Welcome! To me, even the better sports owners are jackasses and jock-sniffers. Among the problems is that sports-ownership is (for some, not all) as much a 'hobby' as a business (although I suppose a lot of other businesses are similar). Owners are less concerned with the bottom line than with proving what a bunch of bad-asses they are. They get off on scr*wing over players in the same way they enjoy extorting public funds for, say, new stadiums etc. (I don't know [or particularly care] whether that opinion is rational or well-founded; but I do suspect there is nothing sports owners will ever do to change it.)
  8. My 'participation fee' is $0, and I probably watch half the games the RS play. How anyone can support the billionaire bosses over the ones we watch perform is beyond me, but you know what you're about more than I do.
  9. ANOTHER good point!
  10. Excellent point!
  11. I'm sure we've all had people close to us do that. It's taken me years to accept (or try) that when someone does that, they are likely in such a place that there is no way even for someone who loves them dearly to 'reach' them. (rip Eloise).
  12. But then again, doesn't 'normal position' have something of a different meaning in these days of constant shifts? (I've never understood why, in basic shift, they don't simply move 3b to short rf, leaving everyone else in their usual position. Is that ever done? Or is the change in ball angle and spin too much for most 3b?
  13. Wow. Late 40s. Various rumors about cause of death but all speculation. I can't remember: was he associated with PEDs? or is it just the name that makes me think that? (Never mind: I see even the ESPN article, which I hadn't seen, answers this question.)
  14. Renfroe's play right up there with Manny's catch, high-fiving the fan, and doubling up the runner at first. (And who was the guy--good hitter, horrible glove--who over-ran the ball in left, reached back, and caught it bare-handed with his throwing hand?)
  15. or if he hadn't held the damn ball!
  16. What good is a mediator going to do? If MLB were arguing in good faith (and if history is any indication, they NEVER have done that), they would start by opening the books. As for your notion that "the players will be blamed", why not just say "I myself will blame the players." Then explain in detail why you would.
  17. That would be the one.
  18. I don't get it either. All this brings back to me is memories of The Pop-Up and the 13 or 14 consecutive post-season losses following the Mookie debacle. Please, George, talk about the rabbits.
  19. I doubt he used the phrase "victim of the rule." All you lose then is the time it takes to interview.
  20. If this were true (i.e., an either/or personal 'choice' where you chose the 'uber-rich' OR the 'poor'), then half (?) the mythical people you cite or imagine to exist are pieces of sh*t.
  21. I remember exactly where I was when I heard Kennedy had been shot, and also when I heard the call of Nava's g.s.
  22. I remember Smolz, Nipper, and of course Wake. No others, even though the radio has been on almost constantly for RS games in my house since '72 (at least during the summer) and well before!
  23. Yeah, one of several, as I recall, brought in as if to relive the apparent magic of getting rid of Nomar. Orlando to Renteria to Lugo ...
  24. There are certain posters who have apparently been brought up in a self-created culture of grievance, and have been deluded into thinking that a sign of sensitivity and depth of soul is feeling and rooting out 'offense'.
  25. But then, 'expectations' is a slippery concept. the only way to judge GMs on a quantitative basis would be by comparing results against available financial resources, no? (And that would take a few years of his tenure to determine.)
×
×
  • Create New...